These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10090918)

  • 81. A robust identity-by-descent procedure using affected sib pairs: multipoint mapping for complex diseases.
    Liang KY; Chiu YF; Beaty TH
    Hum Hered; 2001; 51(1-2):64-78. PubMed ID: 11096273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Robustness and power of the maximum-likelihood-binomial and maximum-likelihood-score methods, in multipoint linkage analysis of affected-sibship data.
    Abel L; Müller-Myhsok B
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Aug; 63(2):638-47. PubMed ID: 9683590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Effect of Box-Cox transformation on power of Haseman-Elston and maximum-likelihood variance components tests to detect quantitative trait Loci.
    Etzel CJ; Shete S; Beasley TM; Fernandez JR; Allison DB; Amos CI
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(2-3):108-16. PubMed ID: 12931049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Linkage and association with structural relationships.
    Province MA
    Adv Genet; 2001; 42():183-90. PubMed ID: 11037321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Conventional multipoint nonparametric linkage analysis is not necessarily inherently biased.
    Visscher PM; Wray NR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Oct; 75(4):718-20; author reply 723-7. PubMed ID: 15338458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Adjusting for covariates on a slippery slope: linkage analysis of change over time.
    Rampersaud E; Allen A; Li YJ; Shao Y; Bass M; Haynes C; Ashley-Koch A; Martin ER; Schmidt S; Hauser ER
    BMC Genet; 2003 Dec; 4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S50. PubMed ID: 14975118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Mathematical assumptions versus biological reality: myths in affected sib pair linkage analysis.
    Elston RC; Song D; Iyengar SK
    Am J Hum Genet; 2005 Jan; 76(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 15540158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Asymptotic properties of affected-sib-pair linkage analysis.
    Holmans P
    Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 52(2):362-74. PubMed ID: 8430697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Allele sharing and allelic association I: sib pair tests with increased power.
    Lazzeroni LC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Apr; 22(4):328-44. PubMed ID: 11984865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Highly significant linkage to the SLI1 locus in an expanded sample of individuals affected by specific language impairment.
    SLI Consortium (SLIC)
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Jun; 74(6):1225-38. PubMed ID: 15133743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Likelihood-based models for genetic linkage analysis using affected sib pairs.
    Olson JM
    Hum Hered; 1997; 47(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 9097092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Gene-environment interaction and affected sib pair linkage analysis.
    Gauderman WJ; Siegmund KD
    Hum Hered; 2001; 52(1):34-46. PubMed ID: 11359066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. A linkage strategy for detection of human quantitative-trait loci. I. Generalized relative risk ratios and power of sib pairs with extreme trait values.
    Gu C; Rao DC
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Jul; 61(1):200-10. PubMed ID: 9246001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Transmission-ratio distortion and allele sharing in affected sib pairs: a new linkage statistic with reduced bias, with application to chromosome 6q25.3.
    Lemire M; Roslin NM; Laprise C; Hudson TJ; Morgan K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Oct; 75(4):571-86. PubMed ID: 15322985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. No bias in linkage analysis.
    Abecasis G; Cox N; Daly MJ; Kruglyak L; Laird N; Markianos K; Patterson N
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Oct; 75(4):722-3; author reply 723-7. PubMed ID: 15338460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Reconsidering the asymptotic null distribution of likelihood ratio tests for genetic linkage in multivariate variance components models under complete pleiotropy.
    Han SS; Chang JT
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):226-41. PubMed ID: 20029057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Power calculations for a general class of family-based association tests: dichotomous traits.
    Lange C; Laird NM
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Sep; 71(3):575-84. PubMed ID: 12181775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. How sib pairs reveal linkage.
    Drigalenko E
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Oct; 63(4):1242-5. PubMed ID: 9758613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Allele identical by descent sharing at any point of a chromosome of a sib pair.
    Drigalenko E
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Oct; 63(4):1245-7. PubMed ID: 9758614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Even a deficit of shared marker alleles in affected sib pairs can yield evidence for linkage.
    Knapp M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Aug; 59(2):485-6. PubMed ID: 8755942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.