These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10091079)

  • 1. The effect of DICOM on QCA and clinical trials.
    Reiber JH; Koning G; Goedhart B
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998; 14 Suppl 1():7-12. PubMed ID: 10091079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Replacement of cinefilm with a digital archive and review network.
    Cusma JT; Wondrow MA; Holmes DR
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 10453381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative coronary arteriography: current status and future.
    Reiber JH; Goedhart B; Brand GJ; Schiemanck L; van der Zwet PM
    Heart Vessels; 1997; Suppl 12():209-11. PubMed ID: 9476585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The digital cardiac network: today and the future.
    Katz S
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998; 14 Suppl 1():23-5. PubMed ID: 10091083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cardiac angiography without cine film: erecting a "Tower of Babel" in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. American College of Cardiology Cardiac Catheterization Committee.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Sep; 24(3):834-7. PubMed ID: 8077561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cine film replacement: digital archival requirements and remaining obstacles.
    Holmes DR; Wondrow MA; Bell MR; Nissen SE; Cusma JT
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1998 Jul; 44(3):346-56; discussion 357. PubMed ID: 9676813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of image enhancement and reconstruction on quantitative coronary arteriography.
    van der Zwet PM; Reiber JH
    Int J Card Imaging; 1995 Dec; 11(4):211-21. PubMed ID: 8596059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The DICOM review stations: are they truly different?
    Goedhart B; Brand GJ; Reiber JH
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):317-22. PubMed ID: 10453384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improvement of digital coronary angiography: high resolution processing coupled with a real time functional synchronization procedure.
    Azancot I; Eiferman C; Le Dref O; Beaufils P; Favereau X; Kedra AW; Slama R
    Int J Card Imaging; 1992; 8(2):109-19. PubMed ID: 1629637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproducibility of quantitative coronary analysis, Assessment of variability due to frame selection, different observers, and different cinefilmless laboratories.
    Sirnes PA; Myreng Y; Mølstad P; Golf S
    Int J Card Imaging; 1996 Sep; 12(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 8915721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Angiographic assessment of dimensions of 6F and 7F Mallinckrodt Softouch coronary contrast catheters from digital and cine arteriograms.
    Koning G; van der Zwet PM; von Land CD; Reiber JH
    Int J Card Imaging; 1992; 8(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 1629641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Filmless cardiac imaging: motion or commotion?
    Vastenaeken GD
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998; 14 Suppl 1():19-22. PubMed ID: 10091082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the use of DICOM cine header information for optimisation: results from the 2002 European DIMOND cardiology survey.
    Vano E; Padovani R; Bernardi G; Ten JI; Peterzol A; Dowling A; Bosmans H; Kottou S; Olivari Z; Faulkner K; Balter S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):162-5. PubMed ID: 16461506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiolgoy International Study of Angiographic Data Compression Phase II: the effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography. Joint Photographic Experts Group.
    Tuinenburg JC; Koning G; Hekking E; Zwinderman AH; Becker T; Simon R; Reiber JH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Apr; 35(5):1380-7. PubMed ID: 10758988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolution of the filmless cardiac angiography suite: promise and perils of the evolving digital era.
    Nissen SE
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Aug; 78(3A):41-4. PubMed ID: 8751846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase II. The effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography.
    Tuinenburg JC; Koning G; Hekking E; Zwinderman AH; Becker T; Simon R; Reiber JH
    Eur Heart J; 2000 Apr; 21(8):679-86. PubMed ID: 10731406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coronary arteriography for quantitative analysis: experimental and clinical comparison of cinefilm and video recordings.
    Ozaki Y; Keane D; Herrman JP; Foley D; Haase J; den Boer A; di Mario C; Serruys PW
    Am Heart J; 1995 Mar; 129(3):471-5. PubMed ID: 7872173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The hemodynamics laboratory without cine film. A comparison between the production costs of 35-mm film and the recordable compact disk].
    Danzi GB; Fiocca L; Dallavalle F; Capuano C; Chioin R; Riva S; Quaini E
    G Ital Cardiol; 1998 Aug; 28(8):887-92. PubMed ID: 9773314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of quantitative coronary arteriography using cinefilm and digital images].
    Arai H; Sato H; Aizawa T; Watanabe H
    J Cardiol; 2001 May; 37(5):241-8. PubMed ID: 11392892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrated image storage solution for the Cath department.
    Weterings RA
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):349-56. PubMed ID: 10453389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.