124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10093521)
1. Guided tissue regeneration versus coronally repositioned flap in the treatment of recession with double papillae.
Matarasso S; Cafiero C; Coraggio F; Vaia E; de Paoli S
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1998 Oct; 18(5):444-53. PubMed ID: 10093521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment outcomes of ligature-induced recession in the dog model using guided tissue regeneration or coronally positioned flap procedures.
Papageorgiou A; Vouros I; Konstantinidis A
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2009 Apr; 11(2):177-87. PubMed ID: 19431957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of gingival recessions by guided tissue regeneration and coronally advanced flap.
Banihashemrad A; Aghassizadeh E; Radvar M
N Y State Dent J; 2009 Jan; 75(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 19280831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession defects.
Trombelli L; Scabbia A; Tatakis DN; Calura G
J Periodontol; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1271-7. PubMed ID: 9848537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guided tissue regeneration in Class II furcation defects using a resorbable polylactic acid barrier.
Bremm LL; Sallum AW; Casati MZ; Nociti FH; Sallum EA
Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):443-6. PubMed ID: 15724758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.
Paolantonio M
J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Guided tissue regeneration using a bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human buccal recession. A re-entry study.
Waterman CA
J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):982-9. PubMed ID: 9358365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of 2 root coverage techniques: guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable matrix style membrane versus a connective tissue graft combined with a coronally positioned pedicle graft without vertical incisions. results of a series of consecutive cases.
Harris RJ
J Periodontol; 1998 Dec; 69(12):1426-34. PubMed ID: 9926774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession.
Amarante ES; Leknes KN; Skavland J; Lie T
J Periodontol; 2000 Jun; 71(6):989-98. PubMed ID: 10914803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment of gingival recession using a collagen membrane with or without the use of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft for space maintenance.
Kimble KM; Eber RM; Soehren S; Shyr Y; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2004 Feb; 75(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 15068108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a biodegradable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession. A 6-year follow-up study.
Leknes KN; Amarante ES; Price DE; Bøe OE; Skavland RJ; Lie T
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):518-29. PubMed ID: 15842269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mucogingival versus guided tissue regeneration procedures in the treatment of deep recession type defects.
Zucchelli G; Clauser C; De Sanctis M; Calandriello M
J Periodontol; 1998 Feb; 69(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 9526912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Guided tissue regeneration versus mucogingival surgery in the treatment of human buccal gingival recession.
Pini Prato G; Tinti C; Vincenzi G; Magnani C; Cortellini P; Clauser C
J Periodontol; 1992 Nov; 63(11):919-28. PubMed ID: 1453307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable polylactic acid membrane in gingival recessions. A histometric study in dogs.
Casati MZ; Sallum EA; Caffesse RG; Nociti FH; Sallum AW; Pereira SL
J Periodontol; 2000 Feb; 71(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 10711614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enamel matrix derivative and coronal flaps to cover marginal tissue recessions.
Castellanos A; de la Rosa M; de la Garza M; Caffesse RG
J Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 77(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 16579697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Guided tissue regeneration versus mucogingival surgery in the treatment of human buccal recessions. A 4-year follow-up study.
Pini Prato G; Clauser C; Cortellini P; Tinti C; Vincenzi G; Pagliaro U
J Periodontol; 1996 Nov; 67(11):1216-23. PubMed ID: 8959573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a new bioabsorbable barrier for recession therapy: a feasibility study.
Jepsen S; Heinz B; Kermanie MA; Jepsen K
J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1433-40. PubMed ID: 11022772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of combined regenerative treatments in human mandibular class II furcation defects.
Santana RB; de Mattos CM; Van Dyke T
J Periodontol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1756-64. PubMed ID: 19905945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A preliminary comparative study of the guided tissue regeneration and free gingival graft procedures for adjacent facial root coverage.
Ito K; Oshio K; Shiomi N; Murai S
Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):319-26. PubMed ID: 11203942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Root coverage employing an envelope technique or guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable membrane.
Müller HP; Stahl M; Eger T
J Periodontol; 1999 Jul; 70(7):743-51. PubMed ID: 10440635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
