74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10093636)
1. Challenges of developing a cervical screening information system: the Ontario pilot project.
Marrett LD; Theis B; Baker MI; Whittick D
Cancer Prev Control; 1998 Oct; 2(5):221-7. PubMed ID: 10093636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. National registry of cervical cytologic diagnoses in The Netherlands.
Vooijs GP; Casparie-van Velsen IA; Peters FA; Beck HL
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):825-30. PubMed ID: 2588915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual inspection of the cervix as a primary means of cervical cancer screening: results of a pilot study.
Chirenje ZM; Chipato T; Kasule J; Rusakaniko S
Cent Afr J Med; 1999 Feb; 45(2):30-3. PubMed ID: 10444896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 1.
Jordan J; Arbyn M; Martin-Hirsch P; Schenck U; Baldauf JJ; Da Silva D; Anttila A; Nieminen P; Prendiville W
Cytopathology; 2008 Dec; 19(6):342-54. PubMed ID: 19040546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Progress in screening for cervical cancer.
Clarke EA
CMAJ; 1996 Oct; 155(8):1036-7. PubMed ID: 8873623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.
Shaller D
Pediatrics; 2004 Jan; 113(1 Pt 2):217-27. PubMed ID: 14702504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices regarding breast and cervical cancer screening in selected ethnocultural groups in Northwestern Ontario.
Steven D; Fitch M; Dhaliwal H; Kirk-Gardner R; Sevean P; Jamieson J; Woodbeck H
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2004; 31(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 15017446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Objective screening for cervical cancer in developing nations: lessons from Nigeria.
Roblyer D; Richards-Kortum R; Park SY; Adewole I; Follen M
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1 Suppl 1):S94-7. PubMed ID: 17825396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colorectal cancer screening - using informatics and compunetics to empower the at-risk individual.
Aramini JJ; Zhang X; Popovich ML
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 137():42-8. PubMed ID: 18560066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical cancer screening.
Holcomb K; Runowicz CD
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 14(4):777-97. PubMed ID: 16226691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of visual inspection and Papanicolau (PAP) smears for cervical cancer screening in Honduras: should PAP smears be abandoned?
Perkins RB; Langrish SM; Stern LJ; Figueroa J; Simon CJ
Trop Med Int Health; 2007 Sep; 12(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 17875013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Computerized monitoring for integrated cervical screening. Rationale, methods and indicators of participation].
Bucchi L; Pierri C; Caprara L; Cortecchia S; De Lillo M; Bondi A
Pathologica; 2003 Feb; 95(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 12735281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Achieving effective cervical screening coverage in South Africa through human resources and health systems development.
Kawonga M; Fonn S
Reprod Health Matters; 2008 Nov; 16(32):32-40. PubMed ID: 19027620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mobilization for cervical cancer screening: lessons from a poor-urban Yoruba community in Nigeria.
Thomas JO; Babarinsa IA; Ajayi IO; Fawole O; Ojemakinde KO; Omigbodun AO
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2005 Mar; 34(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 15973782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Probabilistic linkage of computerized ambulance and inpatient hospital discharge records: a potential tool for evaluation of emergency medical services.
Dean JM; Vernon DD; Cook L; Nechodom P; Reading J; Suruda A
Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Jun; 37(6):616-26. PubMed ID: 11385330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for cervical cytology terminology.
Herbert A; Bergeron C; Wiener H; Schenck U; Klinkhamer P; Bulten J; Arbyn M
Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):213-9. PubMed ID: 17635161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Papanicolaou screening in developing countries: an idea whose time has come.
Suba EJ; Raab SS;
Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 Mar; 121(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 15023034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Issues in identification and linkage of patient records across an integrated delivery system.
Arellano MG; Weber GI
J Healthc Inf Manag; 1998; 12(3):43-52. PubMed ID: 10338786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
