These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10094299)
1. Correlation of anthropometry with CT in Mexican-American women. Keller C; Chintapalli K; Lancaster J Res Nurs Health; 1999 Apr; 22(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 10094299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of intra-abdominal and subcutaneous abdominal fat: relation between anthropometry and computed tomography. Seidell JC; Oosterlee A; Thijssen MA; Burema J; Deurenberg P; Hautvast JG; Ruijs JH Am J Clin Nutr; 1987 Jan; 45(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 3799506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of abdominal and intra-abdominal fat in postmenopausal women by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometry: comparison with computerized tomography. Svendsen OL; Hassager C; Bergmann I; Christiansen C Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1993 Jan; 17(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 8383641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sex-specific associations of magnetic resonance imaging-derived intra-abdominal and subcutaneous fat areas with conventional anthropometric indices. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Schreiner PJ; Terry JG; Evans GW; Hinson WH; Crouse JR; Heiss G Am J Epidemiol; 1996 Aug; 144(4):335-45. PubMed ID: 8712190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of regional body fat distribution: comparison between W/H ratio and computed tomography in obese women. Zamboni M; Armellini F; Milani MP; Todesco T; De Marchi M; Robbi R; Montresor G; Bergamo AI; Bosello O J Intern Med; 1992 Oct; 232(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 1402638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total and intra-abdominal fat measurements by ultrasound and computerized tomography. Armellini F; Zamboni M; Robbi R; Todesco T; Rigo L; Bergamo-Andreis IA; Bosello O Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1993 Apr; 17(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 8387970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sagittal abdominal diameter as a practical predictor of visceral fat. Zamboni M; Turcato E; Armellini F; Kahn HS; Zivelonghi A; Santana H; Bergamo-Andreis IA; Bosello O Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1998 Jul; 22(7):655-60. PubMed ID: 9705025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting intra-abdominal fatness from anthropometric measures: the influence of stature. Han TS; McNeill G; Seidell JC; Lean ME Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1997 Jul; 21(7):587-93. PubMed ID: 9226490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Body fat distribution in pre- and post-menopausal women: metabolic and anthropometric variables and their inter-relationships. Zamboni M; Armellini F; Milani MP; De Marchi M; Todesco T; Robbi R; Bergamo-Andreis IA; Bosello O Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1992 Jul; 16(7):495-504. PubMed ID: 1323546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of adipose tissue distribution by computed axial tomography in obese women: association with body density and anthropometric measurements. Ferland M; Després JP; Tremblay A; Pinault S; Nadeau A; Moorjani S; Lupien PJ; Thériault G; Bouchard C Br J Nutr; 1989 Mar; 61(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 2706220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasonography and anthropometry for measuring regional body fat in HIV-infected patients. Padilla S; Gallego JA; Masiá M; Ardoy F; Hernández I; Gutiérrez F Curr HIV Res; 2007 Sep; 5(5):459-66. PubMed ID: 17896965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Generalized abdominal visceral fat prediction models for black and white adults aged 17-65 y: the HERITAGE Family Study. Stanforth PR; Jackson AS; Green JS; Gagnon J; Rankinen T; Desprès JP; Bouchard C; Leon AS; Rao DC; Skinner JS; Wilmore JH Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2004 Jul; 28(7):925-32. PubMed ID: 15148505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is it possible to derive a reliable estimate of human visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue from simple anthropometric measurements? Bonora E; Micciolo R; Ghiatas AA; Lancaster JL; Alyassin A; Muggeo M; DeFronzo RA Metabolism; 1995 Dec; 44(12):1617-25. PubMed ID: 8786733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and reliability of the sagittal abdominal diameter as a predictor of visceral abdominal fat. Sampaio LR; Simões EJ; Assis AM; Ramos LR Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol; 2007 Aug; 51(6):980-6. PubMed ID: 17934666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anthropometric or ultrasonic measurements in assessment of visceral fat? A comparative study. Tornaghi G; Raiteri R; Pozzato C; Rispoli A; Bramani M; Cipolat M; Craveri A Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1994 Nov; 18(11):771-5. PubMed ID: 7866479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computed tomography measurement of abdominal fat deposition in relation to anthropometry. Weits T; van der Beek EJ; Wedel M; Ter Haar Romeny BM Int J Obes; 1988; 12(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 3391738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Which measure of body fat distribution is best for epidemiologic research? Mueller WH; Wear ML; Hanis CL; Emerson JB; Barton SA; Hewett-Emmett D; Schull WJ Am J Epidemiol; 1991 May; 133(9):858-69. PubMed ID: 2028976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sagittal abdominal diameter compared with other anthropometric measurements in relation to cardiovascular risk. Ohrvall M; Berglund L; Vessby B Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2000 Apr; 24(4):497-501. PubMed ID: 10805508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methods of estimation of visceral fat: advantages of ultrasonography. Ribeiro-Filho FF; Faria AN; Azjen S; Zanella MT; Ferreira SR Obes Res; 2003 Dec; 11(12):1488-94. PubMed ID: 14694213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sonography detection of small intra-abdominal fat variations. Armellini F; Zamboni M; Rigo L; Bergamo-Andreis IA; Robbi R; De Marchi M; Bosello O Int J Obes; 1991 Dec; 15(12):847-52. PubMed ID: 1794927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]