111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10094532)
1. Three women win in cancer screening case.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1999 Feb; 318(7182):484. PubMed ID: 10094532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A smear on audit. Implications of the Leicester cervical smear audit.
Symonds P; Naftalin N; Shaw P
BJOG; 2003 Jul; 110(7):646-8. PubMed ID: 12842054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Smear tests were not on trial but should have been.
Anderson CM
BMJ; 1999 Apr; 318(7189):1007. PubMed ID: 10195979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. False-negative cervical smears: medico-legal fallacies and suggested remedies.
Slater DN
Cytopathology; 1998 Jun; 9(3):145-54. PubMed ID: 9638375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening for breast and cervical cancer as a common cause for litigation. A false negative result may be one of an irreducible minimum of errors.
Wilson RM
BMJ; 2000 May; 320(7246):1352-3. PubMed ID: 10818006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear.
Sirota RL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Dec; 121(12):1237-8. PubMed ID: 9431309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative smears].
Vassilakos P; de Marval F; Muñoz M
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1998 Jan; 118(1):97. PubMed ID: 9580199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative vaginal smears].
Weintraub D
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Nov; 117(11):921. PubMed ID: 9471658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Shadow over the screen.
Wilson M
Nurs Times; 1987 Oct 28-Nov 4; 83(43):19-20. PubMed ID: 3697164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Improvements needed in cervical screening in England.
Wise J
BMJ; 1998 Apr; 316(7140):1261. PubMed ID: 9599046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cervical cancer screening. False negative smears].
Vassilakos P; De Marval F; Muñoz M
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Aug; 117(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 9340714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The standard of care in cytopathology.
Gatter K
Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Aug; 112(2):273-4. PubMed ID: 10439809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical screening: what is the point?
Soutter WP
Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):244-5; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical screening: what is the point?
Denton KJ
Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):244; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving Pap smears.
Loeb RA
Am Fam Physician; 1989 Dec; 40(6):48, 50. PubMed ID: 2589151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical screening: what is the point?
Robertson J; Woodend B
Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Audit shows weaknesses in cervical cancer screening.
Ferriman A
BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7295):1141. PubMed ID: 11348903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Pap smear: a victim of its own success?
Steigman CK; Vernick JP
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2002 Aug; 34(8):8-14; quiz 14-5. PubMed ID: 12228932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Are we ready for a paradigm change in cervical cancer screening?
Franco EL
Lancet; 2003 Dec; 362(9399):1866-7. PubMed ID: 14667737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Does cervical cancer screening do more harm than good?
Payne L; Lavis P
Nurs Times; 2001 Jul 19-25; 97(29):20. PubMed ID: 11957496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
