306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10094873)
1. A comparison between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical dysplasia: residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy specimen.
Huang LW; Hwang JL
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Apr; 73(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 10094873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prevalence and risk factors for residual cervical neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy following LEEP or conization.
Natee J; Therasakvichaya S; Boriboonhirunsarn D
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88(10):1344-8. PubMed ID: 16519377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias].
Hillemanns P; Kimmig R; Dannecker C; Noorzai T; Diebold J; Thaler CJ; Hepp H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10785949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Cold-Knife Conization versus Loop Electrosurgical Excision for Cervical Adenocarcinoma In Situ (ACIS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Jiang Y; Chen C; Li L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170587. PubMed ID: 28125627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Excisional treatment in women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS): a prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority trial to compare AIS persistence/recurrence after loop electrosurgical excision procedure with cold knife cone biopsy: protocol for a pilot study.
Cohen PA; Brand A; Sykes P; Wrede DCH; McNally O; Eva L; Rao A; Campion M; Stockler M; Powell A; Codde J; Bulsara MK; Anderson L; Leung Y; Farrell L; Stoyles P
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e017576. PubMed ID: 28851799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
Wang XI; Huang F; Zhang S
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2017 Nov; 47(6):663-667. PubMed ID: 29263039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cold knife conization vs. LEEP. Are they the same procedure?
Fanning J; Padratzik J
J Reprod Med; 2002 Jan; 47(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 11838307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife conization on pregnancy outcomes.
Guo HJ; Guo RX; Liu YL
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 23590007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interpretability of excisional biopsies of the cervix: cone biopsy and loop excision.
Miroshnichenko GG; Parva M; Holtz DO; Klemens JA; Dunton CJ
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 19098600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Diagnosis and treatment value of colposcopy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of 135 cases].
Xiao FY; Wang Q; Zheng RL; Chen M; Su TT; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 51(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 27030497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Compliance after loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife cone biopsy.
Greenspan DL; Faubion M; Coonrod DV; Hart KW; Mathieson K
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):675-80. PubMed ID: 17766617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Instead of Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Unsatisfactory Colposcopic Examinations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
El-Nashar SA; Shazly SA; Hopkins MR; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Famuyide AO
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Apr; 21(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 27977541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing the choice between cold knife conization and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Shin JW; Rho HS; Park CY
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Feb; 35(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 19215559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical significance of a negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure, conization and hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Murta EF; Silva AO; Silva EA
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2006; 27(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 16550969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a comparison of loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization.
Latif NA; Neubauer NL; Helenowski IB; Lurain JR
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Apr; 19(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 25089550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positive margin prevalence and risk factors with cervical specimens obtained from loop electrosurgical excision procedures and cold knife conization.
Panna S; Luanratanakorn S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2009; 10(4):637-40. PubMed ID: 19827885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pregnancy outcome after the treatment of loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold-knife conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Liu Y; Qiu HF; Tang Y; Chen J; Lv J
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2014; 77(4):240-4. PubMed ID: 24752130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
