These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10096300)
1. Have you bargained away patent rights? Inventors and entrepreneurs need to consider a recent Supreme Court ruling in their patent strategies. Baggot B Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Mar; 17(3):297-8. PubMed ID: 10096300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. US Supreme Court applies strict limits to patents. Robertson D Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jul; 20(7):639. PubMed ID: 12089532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Patents. U.S. Supreme Court delves into what is and isn't patentable. Marshall E Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5933):1374. PubMed ID: 19520926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A guide to drug discovery. Protecting your inventions: the patent system. Webber PM Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2003 Oct; 2(10):823-30. PubMed ID: 14526385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pharmaceutical patent life-cycle management after KSR v. Teleflex. Furrow ME Food Drug Law J; 2008; 63(1):275-320. PubMed ID: 18561462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. US Supreme Court decision could compromise biotech patents. Robertson D Nat Biotechnol; 2001 May; 19(5):394. PubMed ID: 11328981 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Patent first, ask questions later: morality and biotechnology in patent law. Bagley MA William Mary Law Rev; 2003 Dec; 45(2):469-547. PubMed ID: 15570677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monsters at the patent office: the inconsistent conclusions of moral utility and the controversy of human cloning. Smith AR De Paul Law Rev; 2003; 53(1):159-203. PubMed ID: 15568254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US court bolsters biotech patent protection. Harrison C Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Aug; 29(8):672-3. PubMed ID: 21822224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Roche's Taq patent 'obtained by deceit', rules US court. Dalton R Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6763):709. PubMed ID: 10617182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Patents. Signature on visitor's form fuels Stanford v. Roche court battle. Marshall E Science; 2011 Apr; 332(6026):163. PubMed ID: 21474725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Obviousness, hindsight and perspective: the impact of KSR v. Teleflex on biotech and pharmaceutical patents. Teitelbaum R; Cohen M Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Oct; 25(10):1105-6. PubMed ID: 17921990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]