BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10096476)

  • 1. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
    Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Morphological findings in explanted Toronto stentless porcine valves.
    Butany J; Collins MJ; Nair V; Leask RL; Scully HE; Williams WG; David TE
    Cardiovasc Pathol; 2006; 15(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 16414456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inflammation and infection in nine surgically explanted Medtronic Freestyle stentless aortic valves.
    Butany J; Zhou T; Leong SW; Cunningham KS; Thangaroopan M; Jegatheeswaran A; Feindel C; David TE
    Cardiovasc Pathol; 2007; 16(5):258-67. PubMed ID: 17868876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Results of reoperation for primary tissue failure of porcine bioprostheses.
    Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Valfré C; Talenti E; Guerra F; Thiene G; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Oct; 90(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 4046622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion.
    Legarra JJ; Llorens R; Catalan M; Segura I; Trenor AM; de Buruaga JS; Rabago G; Sarralde A
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis.
    David TE; Ivanov J; Armstrong S; Feindel CM; Cohen G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 121(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 11174732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early mechanical failures of the Hancock pericardial xenograft.
    Bortolotti U; Milano A; Thiene G; Guerra F; Mazzucco A; Valente M; Talenti E; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Aug; 94(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 3613618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
    Hartz RS; Fisher EB; Finkelmeier B; DeBoer A; Sanders JH; Moran JM; Michaelis LL
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Structural changes of Hancock bioprostheses in children (author's transl)].
    Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Callucci V; Valente M; Del Maschio A; Valfrè C; Thiene G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1980; 10(11):1520-5. PubMed ID: 7202899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?
    Jamieson WR; Gudas VM; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Fradet GJ; Ling H; Germann E; Lichtenstein SV
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 19056294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pathological analysis of nonstented Freestyle aortic root bioprostheses treated with amino oleic acid.
    Fyfe BS; Schoen FJ
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Oct; 11(4 Suppl 1):151-6. PubMed ID: 10660184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Valve-related complications with the Hancock I porcine bioprosthesis. A twelve- to fourteen-year follow-up study.
    Bernal JM; Rabasa JM; Cagigas JC; Echevarria JR; Carrion MF; Revuelta JM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 May; 101(5):871-80. PubMed ID: 2023444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New morphologic aspects of explanted Hancock Extracorporeal pericardial bioprostheses.
    Vetter HO; Krupa W; Nerlich A; Welsch U; Weinhold C; Schmitz C; Reichart B
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 May; 3(3):335-43. PubMed ID: 8087275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pathology of the Pericarbon bovine pericardial xenograft implanted in humans.
    Valente M; Ius P; Bortolotti U; Talenti E; Bottio T; Thiene G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Mar; 7(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 9587859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Toronto SPV bioprosthesis: review of morphological findings in eight valves.
    Butany J; de Sa M; Feindel CM; David TE
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Oct; 11(4 Suppl 1):157-62. PubMed ID: 10660185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Excellent durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A sixteen-year follow-up study.
    Kawachi Y; Tominaga R; Hisahara M; Nakashima A; Yasui H; Tokunaga K
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Dec; 104(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 1453721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pathological study of infective endocarditis on Hancock porcine bioprostheses.
    Bortolotti U; Thiene G; Milano A; Panizzon G; Valente M; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981 Jun; 81(6):934-42. PubMed ID: 7230861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
    Mudra H; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age as a determinant for selection of porcine bioprostheses for cardiac valve replacement: experience with Carpentier-Edwards standard bioprosthesis.
    Jamieson WR; Tyers GF; Janusz MT; Miyagishima RT; Munro AI; Ling H; Burr LH; Tutassaura H
    Can J Cardiol; 1991 May; 7(4):181-8. PubMed ID: 2070287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 121.