These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10097208)
1. Should peer review be an open process? Malone RE J Emerg Nurs; 1999 Apr; 25(2):150-2. PubMed ID: 10097208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Referencing in transcultural nursing: an ethical analysis. Davidhizar R; Bechtel GA; McEwen M Nurs Forum; 1999; 34(4):14-8. PubMed ID: 10795264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. If it's too good to be true, it probably is. Kennedy MS Am J Nurs; 2009 Dec; 109(12):7. PubMed ID: 19935148 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Open peer review: a first step. Dougherty MC Nurs Res; 2004; 53(4):213. PubMed ID: 15266157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research governance: Has it become a research hindrance? Gill P; Burnard P Nurse Educ Today; 2009 Feb; 29(2):137-9. PubMed ID: 19108936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer Review: The Science of Nursing Education Depends on It. Patterson BJ Nurs Educ Perspect; 2015; 36(2):75. PubMed ID: 29194129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific integrity and the journal review process. Becker PT Res Nurs Health; 1998 Aug; 21(4):283-4. PubMed ID: 9679805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Maintaining scientific integrity in publications. Fain JA Diabetes Educ; 1997; 23(3):232. PubMed ID: 9257614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Upon Further Review: Peer Process Vital to Publishing. Katz A Oncol Nurs Forum; 2016 Nov; 43(6):675-676. PubMed ID: 27768133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do RAEs accurately measure the quality of nursing research? Richards D; Watson R Nurs Times; 2002 Oct 15-21; 98(42):17. PubMed ID: 12432659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Predatory Journals: A Potential Threat to Nursing Practice and Science. Bourgault AM Crit Care Nurse; 2019 Aug; 39(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 31371362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer review and the nursing literature. Dougherty MC Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Building the ethics of nursing inquiry as we build the science. Foster RL J Soc Pediatr Nurs; 2000; 5(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 10971916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. First Impressions Count! Would an Editor Help Dress Your Manuscript for Success? Monsivais DB Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2017 Aug; 31(3):199-201. PubMed ID: 28793944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical considerations in research from a cancer nurse's perspective. Swift P Prof Nurse; 2002 Nov; 18(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 12465543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can you believe what you read? Woods A Nurs Manage; 2003 Aug; 34(8):4. PubMed ID: 12888721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Top 10 Tips for Undertaking Synthesis Research. Knafl K; Whittemore R Res Nurs Health; 2017 Jun; 40(3):189-193. PubMed ID: 28267870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics: Predatory Publishing: Keeping the Wolves from Your Office Door. Merkle Sorrell J; Owens JK Online J Issues Nurs; 2015 Aug; 20(3):9. PubMed ID: 26882518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Are nurses responsible for disseminating their work? Ward M; Hunt M Nurs Times; 2000 Jun 22-28; 96(25):16. PubMed ID: 11962970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Predatory publishing: What editors need to know. INANE Predatory Publishing Practices Collaborative CANNT J; 2015; 25(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 26882636 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]