These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10097217)

  • 1. Does pregnancy affect the durability of valvular bioprostheses?
    Glower DD
    Am Heart J; 1999 Apr; 137(4 Pt 1):590-1. PubMed ID: 10097217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does pregnancy influence the durability of human aortic valve substitutes?
    Arabkhani B; Heuvelman HJ; Bogers AJ; Mokhles MM; Roos-Hesselink JW; Takkenberg JJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Nov; 60(19):1991-2. PubMed ID: 23062538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bioprostheses are superior to mechanical prostheses.
    Jamieson WR
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():258-71. PubMed ID: 3727698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical factors influencing the durability of heart valve pericardial bioprostheses.
    Gabbay S; Bortolotti U; Josif M
    ASAIO Trans; 1986; 32(1):282-7. PubMed ID: 3778723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of pregnancy on the duration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses.
    Salazar E; Espinola N; Román L; Casanova JM
    Am Heart J; 1999 Apr; 137(4 Pt 1):714-20. PubMed ID: 10097235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative in vitro evaluation of porcine and pericardial bioprostheses.
    Reul H; Giersiepen M; Schindehütte H; Effert S; Rau G
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():223-31. PubMed ID: 3727690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Erroneous sizing of valve bioprostheses?
    Bonchek LI
    J Card Surg; 1992 Jun; 7(2):191-2. PubMed ID: 1606371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative assessment of bioprosthesis durability in the aortic position.
    Grunkemeier GL; Bodnar E
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Jan; 4(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 7742990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. IVth International Symposium on Cardiac Bioprostheses.
    Angell W; Frater RW
    J Card Surg; 1988 Sep; 3(3 Suppl):277-8. PubMed ID: 2908778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Hydrodynamic studies of normal and pathologically changed bioprostheses in the aortic position].
    Heiliger R; Richter H; Mittermayer C
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1985 Sep; 30(9):209-14. PubMed ID: 4052553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Haemodynamics and durability of mitral bioprostheses--an in vitro study.
    Gabbay S; Bortolotti U; Wasserman F; Factor SM
    Eur Heart J; 1984 Oct; 5 Suppl D():65-71. PubMed ID: 6240399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Twenty-year durability of the aortic Hancock II bioprosthesis in young patients: is it durable enough?
    Une D; Ruel M; David TE
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Nov; 46(5):825-30. PubMed ID: 24510909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are bioprostheses superior to mechanical valves?
    Schön HR; Unger B; Weingartner F; Sebening H; Blömer H
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():286-8. PubMed ID: 3727703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Validation of support frame parameters for aortic valve xenograft bioprostheses].
    Barbarash LS; Zavalishin NN; Neniukov AK; Popov VV; Petrov SG
    Med Tekh; 1985; (3):48-55. PubMed ID: 4046796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Durability of porcine bioprosthetic valves.
    van Heurn LW; English TA
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 Feb; 39(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 2011845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The first step to understanding valve failure: an overview of pathology.
    Schoen FJ
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S50-3. PubMed ID: 1389279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Falsely elevated valve gradients by echocardiography in the 3f aortic bioprosthesis.
    Leung Wai Sang S; Samoukovic G; Buithieu J; de Varennes B
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Jul; 96(1):313-7. PubMed ID: 23816086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro pulsatile flow evaluation of a stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis.
    Sung HW; Le TN; Kingsbury CJ; Quintero LJ; Myers KE; Quijano RC
    ASAIO J; 1995; 41(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7727828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aortic Valve Replacement with a Conventional Stented Bioprosthesis versus Sutureless Bioprosthesis: a Study of 763 Patients.
    Mujtaba SS; Ledingham SM; Shah AR; Pillay T; Schueler S; Clark S
    Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2018; 33(2):122-128. PubMed ID: 29898140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of age on late results of valve replacement with porcine bioprostheses.
    Pelletier LC; Carrier M; Leclerc Y; Dyrda I; Gosselin G
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1992; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 1447268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.