These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10097435)

  • 21. Implant angulation: a measurement technique, implant overdenture maintenance, and the influence of surgical experience.
    Walton JN; Huizinga SC; Peck CC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):523-30. PubMed ID: 12066698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Janson M; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):861-8. PubMed ID: 18538250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application.
    Anwar N; Fida M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):516-22. PubMed ID: 19679646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Occlusal changes following posterior tooth loss in adults. Part 1: a study of clinical parameters associated with the extent and type of supraeruption in unopposed posterior teeth.
    Craddock HL; Youngson CC; Manogue M; Blance A
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(6):485-94. PubMed ID: 17559530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dental and alveolar arch asymmetries in normal occlusion and Class II Division 1 and Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Uysal T; Kurt G; Ramoglu SI
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 19388427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 2 articulator.
    Walker F; Ayoub AF; Moos KF; Barbenel J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 46(7):573-8. PubMed ID: 18462853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The reliability of 3 sagittal reference planes in the assessment of Class I and Class III treatment.
    Palleck S; Foley TF; Hall-Scott J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):426-35. PubMed ID: 11298316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile by means of angular measurements.
    Anić-Milosević S; Lapter-Varga M; Slaj M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 18263886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bolton tooth-size ratio revisited.
    Al-Tamimi T; Hashim HA
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 16164113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A biometric guide to prosthetic tooth positioning investigated in subjects with Class II division 2 incisor relationships.
    Agarwal A; Howlett JA; Howell PG
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2000 Dec; 8(4):127-9. PubMed ID: 11692993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of the reproducibility of manual tracing and on-screen digitization for cephalometric profile variables.
    Dvortsin DP; Sandham A; Pruim GJ; Dijkstra PU
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):586-91. PubMed ID: 18719051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cephalometric indicators of the vertical dimension of occlusion.
    Strajnić L; Stanisić-Sinobad D; Marković D; Stojanović L
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Jun; 32(2):535-41. PubMed ID: 18756907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 11298314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of three facebow/semi-adjustable articulator systems for planning orthognathic surgery.
    O'Malley AM; Milosevic A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Jun; 38(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 10864723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants.
    Tawil G; Aboujaoude N; Younan R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 16634499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The lateral leeway in the habitual intercuspation: experimental studies and literature review.
    Utz KH; Müller F; Lückerath W; Schwarting P; Noethlichs W; Büttner R; Fuss E; Grüner M; Koeck B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 34(6):406-13. PubMed ID: 17518974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of cephalometric analyses for assessing sagittal jaw relationship.
    Gul-e-Erum ; Fida M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Nov; 18(11):679-83. PubMed ID: 18983790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.
    Okunami TR; Kusnoto B; BeGole E; Evans CA; Sadowsky C; Fadavi S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 17208106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
    Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Anthropometric planes of head and their application in prosthodontics].
    Terzić M; Sinobad-Stanisić D
    Stomatol Glas Srb; 1989; 36(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 2489906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.