377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10098447)
1. Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability.
Stroom JC; de Boer HC; Huizenga H; Visser AG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Mar; 43(4):905-19. PubMed ID: 10098447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT.
Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Geometrical uncertainties, radiotherapy planning margins, and the ICRU-62 report.
Stroom JC; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2002 Jul; 64(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 12208578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy.
van Herk M; Remeijer P; Rasch C; Lebesque JV
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jul; 47(4):1121-35. PubMed ID: 10863086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A numerical simulation of organ motion and daily setup uncertainties: implications for radiation therapy.
Killoran JH; Kooy HM; Gladstone DJ; Welte FJ; Beard CJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jan; 37(1):213-21. PubMed ID: 9054898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Margins for translational and rotational uncertainties: a probability-based approach.
Remeijer P; Rasch C; Lebesque JV; van Herk M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):464-74. PubMed ID: 12023151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of dosimetric margins in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 18383678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Target margins for random geometrical treatment uncertainties in conformal radiotherapy.
Bel A; van Herk M; Lebesque JV
Med Phys; 1996 Sep; 23(9):1537-45. PubMed ID: 8892251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional dosimetric evaluation of a conventional radiotherapy technique for treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Choi PH; Cheung KY; Lee WY
Radiother Oncol; 2001 Feb; 58(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 11166865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Planning target volumes for radiotherapy: how much margin is needed?
Antolak JA; Rosen II
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jul; 44(5):1165-70. PubMed ID: 10421551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of microscopic disease on the tumor control probability in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Siedschlag C; Boersma L; van Loon J; Rossi M; van Baardwijk A; Gilhuijs K; Stroom J
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 21955665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Convolution method and CTV-to-PTV margins for finite fractions and small systematic errors.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(7):1967-90. PubMed ID: 17374922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inclusion of geometric uncertainties in treatment plan evaluation.
van Herk M; Remeijer P; Lebesque JV
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Apr; 52(5):1407-22. PubMed ID: 11955756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PTV margin determination in conformal SRT of intracranial lesions.
Parker BC; Shiu AS; Maor MH; Lang FF; Liu HH; White RA; Antolak JA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(3):176-89. PubMed ID: 12132939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coverage-based treatment planning to accommodate delineation uncertainties in prostate cancer treatment.
Xu H; Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5435-43. PubMed ID: 26328992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Loss of local control due to tumor displacement as a function of margin size, dose-response slope, and number of fractions.
Selvaraj J; Uzan J; Baker C; Nahum A
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041715. PubMed ID: 23556885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating random patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher MS; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3880-90. PubMed ID: 19810460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An off-line strategy for constructing a patient-specific planning target volume in adaptive treatment process for prostate cancer.
Yan D; Lockman D; Brabbins D; Tyburski L; Martinez A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Aug; 48(1):289-302. PubMed ID: 10925000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a Monte Carlo based robustness calculation and evaluation tool.
Loebner HA; Volken W; Mueller S; Bertholet J; Mackeprang PH; Guyer G; Aebersold DM; Stampanoni MFM; Manser P; Fix MK
Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 49(7):4780-4793. PubMed ID: 35451087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
