BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10098573)

  • 1. Grading the graders: how hospitals in California and New York perceive and interpret their report cards.
    Romano PS; Rainwater JA; Antonius D
    Med Care; 1999 Mar; 37(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 10098573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The California Hospital Outcomes Project: how useful is California's report card for quality improvement?
    Rainwater JA; Romano PS; Antonius DM
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1998 Jan; 24(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 9494872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do well-publicized risk-adjusted outcomes reports affect hospital volume?
    Romano PS; Zhou H
    Med Care; 2004 Apr; 42(4):367-77. PubMed ID: 15076814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Poor data quality, reporting delays render CA, NY hospital report cards 'nearly useless'.
    Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1999 Oct; 3(10):157-60, 145. PubMed ID: 10724607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a consumer-oriented internet health care report card: the risk of quality ratings based on mortality data.
    Krumholz HM; Rathore SS; Chen J; Wang Y; Radford MJ
    JAMA; 2002 Mar; 287(10):1277-87. PubMed ID: 11886319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ranking hospitals on surgical quality: does risk-adjustment always matter?
    Dimick JB; Birkmeyer JD
    J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Sep; 207(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 18722939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attitudes of hospital leaders toward publicly reported measures of health care quality.
    Lindenauer PK; Lagu T; Ross JS; Pekow PS; Shatz A; Hannon N; Rothberg MB; Benjamin EM
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Dec; 174(12):1904-11. PubMed ID: 25286316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of an acute myocardial infarction report card in Ontario, Canada.
    Tu JV; Cameron C
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2003 Apr; 15(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 12705706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What data do California HMOs use to select hospitals for contracting?
    Rainwater JA; Romano PS
    Am J Manag Care; 2003 Aug; 9(8):553-61. PubMed ID: 12921233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Information presentation features and comprehensibility of hospital report cards: design analysis and online survey among users.
    Sander U; Emmert M; Dickel J; Meszmer N; Kolb B
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Mar; 17(3):e68. PubMed ID: 25782186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of the present-on-admission indicator on hospital quality measurement: experience with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators.
    Glance LG; Osler TM; Mukamel DB; Dick AW
    Med Care; 2008 Feb; 46(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 18219238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of cardiac surgeon report cards on patient referral by cardiologists in New York state after 20 years of public reporting.
    Brown DL; Epstein AM; Schneider EC
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2013 Nov; 6(6):643-8. PubMed ID: 24221830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How well do hospital mortality rates reported in the New York State CABG report card predict subsequent hospital performance?
    Glance LG; Dick AW; Mukamel DB; Li Y; Osler TM
    Med Care; 2010 May; 48(5):466-71. PubMed ID: 20351585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Procedure rates and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures in California and New York.
    Carey JS; Danielsen B; Gold JP; Rossiter SJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jun; 129(6):1276-82. PubMed ID: 15942567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of care information makes a difference: an analysis of market share and price changes after publication of the New York State Cardiac Surgery Mortality Reports.
    Mukamel DB; Mushlin AI
    Med Care; 1998 Jul; 36(7):945-54. PubMed ID: 9674613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Canadian comparison of data sources for coronary artery bypass surgery outcome "report cards".
    Ghali WA; Rothwell DM; Quan H; Brant R; Tu JV
    Am Heart J; 2000 Sep; 140(3):402-8. PubMed ID: 10966537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Administrative versus clinical data for coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards: the view from California.
    Parker JP; Li Z; Damberg CL; Danielsen B; Carlisle DM
    Med Care; 2006 Jul; 44(7):687-95. PubMed ID: 16799364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hospital outcomes in major teaching, minor teaching, and nonteaching hospitals in New York state.
    Polanczyk CA; Lane A; Coburn M; Philbin EF; Dec GW; DiSalvo TG
    Am J Med; 2002 Mar; 112(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 11893363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health maintenance organizations and hospital quality for coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Escarce JJ; Van Horn RL; Pauly MV; Williams SV; Shea JA; Chen W
    Med Care Res Rev; 1999 Sep; 56(3):340-62; discussion 363-72. PubMed ID: 10510608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Competition and the impact of online hospital report cards.
    Chou SY; Deily ME; Li S; Lu Y
    J Health Econ; 2014 Mar; 34():42-58. PubMed ID: 24463142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.