These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10099359)

  • 1. Analysis of protein fouling during ultrafiltration using a two-layer membrane model.
    Boyd RF; Zydney AL
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1998 Aug; 59(4):451-60. PubMed ID: 10099359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of protein adsorption on the transport characteristics of asymmetric ultrafiltration membranes.
    Mochizuki S; Zydney AL
    Biotechnol Prog; 1992; 8(6):553-61. PubMed ID: 1369038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adsorption of amylase enzyme on ultrafiltration membranes.
    Beier SP; Enevoldsen AD; Kontogeorgis GM; Hansen EB; Jonsson G
    Langmuir; 2007 Aug; 23(18):9341-51. PubMed ID: 17676883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of a pore-blockage--cake-filtration model to protein fouling during microfiltration.
    Palacio L; Ho CC; Zydney AL
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2002 Aug; 79(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 12115414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting membrane flux decline from complex mixtures using flow-field flow fractionation measurements and semi-empirical theory.
    Pellegrino J; Wright S; Ranvill J; Amy G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):85-92. PubMed ID: 16003965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Combined Pore Blockage and Cake Filtration Model for Protein Fouling during Microfiltration.
    Ho CC; Zydney AL
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2000 Dec; 232(2):389-399. PubMed ID: 11097775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protein fouling behavior of carbon nanotube/polyethersulfone composite membranes during water filtration.
    Celik E; Liu L; Choi H
    Water Res; 2011 Oct; 45(16):5287-94. PubMed ID: 21862096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor (MBR): sludge cake formation and fouling characteristics.
    Ping Chu H; Li XY
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 May; 90(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 15800862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
    Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-performance thin-layer hydrogel composite membranes for ultrafiltration of natural organic matter.
    Susanto H; Ulbricht M
    Water Res; 2008 May; 42(10-11):2827-35. PubMed ID: 18342907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water.
    Kimura K; Hane Y; Watanabe Y; Amy G; Ohkuma N
    Water Res; 2004; 38(14-15):3431-41. PubMed ID: 15276760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative analysis of membrane fouling by protein mixtures using MALDI-MS.
    Chan R; Chen V; Bucknall MP
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2004 Jan; 85(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 14705002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of ion binding on protein transport through ultrafiltration membranes.
    Menon MK; Zydney AL
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1999 May; 63(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 10099609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fundamental mechanisms of three-component combined fouling with experimental verification.
    Kim AS; Contreras AE; Li Q; Yuan R
    Langmuir; 2009 Jul; 25(14):7815-27. PubMed ID: 19480394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of protein surface morphology on the ultrafiltration flux resistance of bovine serum albumin.
    Elysée-Collen B; Lencki RW
    Biotechnol Prog; 1999; 15(4):732-9. PubMed ID: 10441365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of mass retention of dissolved organic matter and membrane pore size on membrane fouling and flux decline.
    Lin CF; Yu-Chen Lin A; Sri Chandana P; Tsai CY
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(2):389-94. PubMed ID: 19013630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effective factors in the treatment of kerosene-water emulsion by using UF membranes.
    Rezvanpour A; Roostaazad R; Hesampour M; Nyström M; Ghotbi C
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jan; 161(2-3):1216-24. PubMed ID: 18539388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of membrane charge on flow and protein transport during ultrafiltration.
    Mehta A; Zydney AL
    Biotechnol Prog; 2006; 22(2):484-92. PubMed ID: 16599566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification and understanding of fouling in low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) filtration by natural organic matter (NOM).
    Lee N; Amy G; Croué JP; Buisson H
    Water Res; 2004 Dec; 38(20):4511-23. PubMed ID: 15556226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of organic and colloidal fouling on the removal of sulphamethoxazole by nanofiltration membranes.
    Nghiem LD; Espendiller C; Braun G
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 18653950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.