709 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10099640)
1. Scientific misconduct and correcting the scientific literature.
Parrish DM
Acad Med; 1999 Mar; 74(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 10099640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct.
Bosch X
J Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 40(9):644-6. PubMed ID: 24505117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Federal agencies can do more to ensure correction of the literature when research misconduct is found.
Parrish DM
Account Res; 2018; 25(6):370-372. PubMed ID: 30064271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case.
Sox HC; Rennie D
Ann Intern Med; 2006 Apr; 144(8):609-13. PubMed ID: 16522625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Misconduct policies in high-impact biomedical journals.
Bosch X; Hernández C; Pericas JM; Doti P; Marušić A
PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e51928. PubMed ID: 23284820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correcting the literature following fraudulent publication.
Friedman PJ
JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1416-9. PubMed ID: 2406474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings.
Resnik DB; Dinse GE
J Med Ethics; 2013 Jan; 39(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 22942373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Wager E; Kleinert S;
Maturitas; 2012 Jun; 72(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 22541357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Historical model for editor and Office of Research Integrity cooperation in handling allegations, investigation, and retraction in a contentious (Abbs) case of research misconduct.
Price AR; Daroff RB
Account Res; 2015; 22(2):63-80. PubMed ID: 25397599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retracted publications in the drug literature.
Samp JC; Schumock GT; Pickard AS
Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):586-95. PubMed ID: 22581659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correcting the scientific record.
Nat Chem Biol; 2008 Jul; 4(7):381. PubMed ID: 18560424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. How should journal editors respond to cases of suspected misconduct?
Wager E
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2014; 35(3):95-101. PubMed ID: 25711228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of the journal editor in sustaining integrity in research.
Caelleigh AS
Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S23-9. PubMed ID: 8373488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.
Wager E; Williams P
J Med Ethics; 2011 Sep; 37(9):567-70. PubMed ID: 21486985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retractions by Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences due to Scientific Misconduct.
Jawaid SA; Jawaid M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Aug; 26(8):718-9. PubMed ID: 27539774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correction and use of biomedical literature affected by scientific misconduct.
Neale AV; Northrup J; Dailey R; Marks E; Abrams J
Sci Eng Ethics; 2007 Mar; 13(1):5-24. PubMed ID: 17703606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE
J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhancing Partnerships of Institutions and Journals to Address Concerns About Research Misconduct: Recommendations From a Working Group of Institutional Research Integrity Officers and Journal Editors and Publishers.
Garfinkel S; Alam S; Baskin P; Bennett C; Carruthers B; Engler J; Flanagin A; Garrity S; Graf C; Imperiale MJ; King C; Kleinert S; Kulp D; Mankowski C; Nugent N; Pulvirenti T; Qualkenbush L; Sobiecki E; Wainstock D; Wilfong E; Wold L; Yucel J
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jun; 6(6):e2320796. PubMed ID: 37378978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preventing Publication of Falsified and Fabricated Data: Roles of Scientists, Editors, Reviewers, and Readers.
Korte SM; van der Heyden MA
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 2017 Feb; 69(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 27851697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Empirical developments in retraction.
Redman BK; Yarandi HN; Merz JF
J Med Ethics; 2008 Nov; 34(11):807-9. PubMed ID: 18974415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
