These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

642 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10099640)

  • 41. Fraud and misconduct in scientific research: a definition and procedures for investigation.
    Catano VM; Turk J
    Med Law; 2007 Sep; 26(3):465-76. PubMed ID: 17970246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals (excerpts).
    International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
    J Am Coll Dent; 2014; 81(3):23-30. PubMed ID: 25951680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists.
    Dooley JJ; Kerch HM
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):109-21. PubMed ID: 11273428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study.
    Stretton S; Bramich NJ; Keys JR; Monk JA; Ely JA; Haley C; Woolley MJ; Woolley KL
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Oct; 28(10):1575-83. PubMed ID: 22978774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Editor's report: scientific misconduct and the responsibility of journal editors.
    Yankauer A
    Am J Public Health; 1990 Apr; 80(4):399-400. PubMed ID: 2316756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Publication rates after the first retraction for biomedical researchers with multiple retracted publications.
    Mistry V; Grey A; Bolland MJ
    Account Res; 2019 Jul; 26(5):277-287. PubMed ID: 31025884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The logical geography of concepts and shared responsibilities concerning research misconduct.
    Guenin LM
    Acad Med; 1996 Jun; 71(6):595-603. PubMed ID: 9125915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Author misconduct: not just the editors' responsibility.
    Brice J; Bligh J
    Med Educ; 2005 Jan; 39(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 15612904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Sources of error in the retracted scientific literature.
    Casadevall A; Steen RG; Fang FC
    FASEB J; 2014 Sep; 28(9):3847-55. PubMed ID: 24928194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Scientific misconduct cases revealed.
    Palca J
    Science; 1990 Apr; 248(4953):297. PubMed ID: 2326642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Seven ways to plagiarize: handling real allegations of research misconduct.
    Loui MC
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2002 Oct; 8(4):529-39. PubMed ID: 12501721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Who is responsible for investigating suspected research misconduct?
    Wager E
    Anaesthesia; 2012 May; 67(5):462-466. PubMed ID: 22404337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Investigating allegations of scientific misconduct.
    Smith J; Godlee F
    BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7511):245-6. PubMed ID: 16051990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Managing research misconduct: is anyone getting it right?
    Tavare A
    BMJ; 2011 Dec; 343():d8212. PubMed ID: 22207043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers.
    Helgesson G; Eriksson S
    Med Health Care Philos; 2018 Sep; 21(3):423-430. PubMed ID: 29222668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Ethical responsibilities of editors, reviewers, and authors.
    Cowell HR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2000 Sep; (378):83-9. PubMed ID: 10986979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Submitting a manuscript for peer review--integrity, integrity, integrity.
    Murphy SP; Bulman C; Shariati B; Hausmann L;
    J Neurochem; 2014 Feb; 128(3):341-3. PubMed ID: 24410543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [The management of errors and scientific fraud by biomedical journals: They cannot replace Institutions].
    Maisonneuve H
    Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):853-60. PubMed ID: 22836196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Responding to allegations of scientific misconduct: the procedure at the French National Medical and Health Research Institute.
    Breittmayer JP; Bungener M; De The H; Eschwege E; Fougereau M; Guedj G; Kordon C; Philippe O; Postel-Vinay MC; Schaffar-Esterle L;
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 11273435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Hans Eysenck affair: Time to correct the scientific record.
    Marks DF
    J Health Psychol; 2019 Mar; 24(4):409-420. PubMed ID: 30791728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.