These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10099641)

  • 1. Medical and scientific organizations and scientific evidence in U.S. trials: lessons from European legal theory.
    Deftos LJ
    Acad Med; 1999 Mar; 74(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 10099641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The war against junk science: the use of expert panels in complex medical-legal scientific litigation.
    Price JM; Rosenberg ES
    Biomaterials; 1998 Aug; 19(16):1425-32. PubMed ID: 9794513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Remarks about the position of the medico-legal expert in imperative regulations in the Penal and Civil Codes].
    Chowaniec C; Nowak A; Chowaniec M; Kobek M
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2005; 55(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 16498966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of the Daubert case on modern litigation.
    Mavroforou A; Michalodimitrakis E
    Med Law; 2008 Dec; 27(4):755-65. PubMed ID: 19202854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expert scientific evidence in the Israeli court.
    Sahar A
    Med Law; 2007 Jun; 26(2):257-82. PubMed ID: 17639850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].
    Gkotsi GM; Moulin V; Gasser J
    Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Estimation of incapacity to work in medico-legal opinions given by clinicians and forensic medicine specialists from the Department of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice--comparative analysis].
    Chowaniec C; Jabłoński C; Kobek M; Chowaniec M
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2005; 55(4):261-3. PubMed ID: 16498964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neuroimaging in criminal trials and the role of psychiatrists expert witnesses: A case study.
    Gkotsi GM; Gasser J; Moulin V
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 65():101359. PubMed ID: 29909218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientific inferences in the laboratory and the law.
    Cranor C
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S121-8. PubMed ID: 16030327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The roles of experts and litigation support consultants in medical-legal claims.
    Friedman HJ; Klee CH
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 11568470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neurologist as expert witness.
    Beresford HR
    Neurol Clin; 1992 Nov; 10(4):1059-71. PubMed ID: 1435658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The court appointment of expert witnesses in the United States: a failed experiment.
    Imwinkelried EJ
    Med Law; 1989; 8(6):601-9. PubMed ID: 2517994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence, expertise and the emergency physician: doctors should anticipate legal reform in their expert evidence.
    Hitchcock T
    Emerg Med (Fremantle); 2001 Mar; 13(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 11476400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomedical scientists and physicians as experts in federal courts.
    Runkle D
    Acad Med; 2001 Aug; 76(8):762-3. PubMed ID: 11500275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expert witness malfeasance: how should specialty societies respond?
    Feld AD; Carey WD
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 May; 100(5):991-5. PubMed ID: 15842567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Medico-legal opinions in penal cases provided by clinicians and forensic medicine specialists--comparative analysis].
    Chowaniec C; Chowaniec M; Nowak A
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2005; 55(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 16498963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Doctors on trial: a comparison of American and Jewish legal approaches to medical malpractice.
    Fruchter J
    Am J Law Med; 1993; 19(4):453-95. PubMed ID: 7942865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.