These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10100038)

  • 1. An in-vitro evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system using bone chips on dried human mandibles.
    Rawlinson A; Ellwood RP; Davies RM
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 10100038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographic absorptiometry method in measurement of localized alveolar bone density changes.
    Kuhl ED; Nummikoski PV
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 10710466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of bone chip orientation on quantitative estimates of changes in bone mass using digital subtraction radiography.
    Mol A; Dunn SM
    J Periodontal Res; 2003 Jun; 38(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 12753368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative analysis of bone density in direct digital radiographs evaluated by means of computerized analysis of digital images.
    Morea C; Dominguez GC; Coutinho A; Chilvarquer I
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Sep; 39(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 20729185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography for the determination of small changes in bone thickness: an in vitro study.
    Christgau M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Kolbeck C; Wenzel A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Apr; 85(4):462-72. PubMed ID: 9574959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The detection of in vitro produced periodontal bone lesions by conventional radiography and photographic subtraction radiography using observers and quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Janssen PT; van Palenstein Helderman WH; van Aken J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Jul; 16(6):335-41. PubMed ID: 2668346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of changes in dental and bone radiographic densities in the presence of different soft-tissue simulators using pixel intensity and digital subtraction analyses.
    de Molon RS; Batitucci RG; Spin-Neto R; Paquier GM; Sakakura CE; Tosoni GM; Scaf G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130235. PubMed ID: 24005061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis of digital subtraction images: in vivo error of the method and effect of thresholding.
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Fourmousis I; Schmid G; Schild U; Lang NP
    J Periodontol; 1998 Sep; 69(9):967-74. PubMed ID: 9776024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system.
    Ellwood RP; Davies RM; Worthington HV
    J Periodontal Res; 1997 Feb; 32(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 9089491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital subtraction radiography for diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions with simulated high-speed systems.
    Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG; Webber RL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Mar; 55(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 6340021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic and digital imaging in periodontal practice.
    Hausmann E
    J Periodontol; 2000 Mar; 71(3):497-503. PubMed ID: 10776940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of JPEG lossy image compression on quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Fidler A; Likar B; Pernus F; Skaleric U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 12076050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of sensitivity and specificity of a new digital subtraction system: an in vitro study.
    Dove SB; McDavid WD; Hamilton KE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Jun; 89(6):771-6. PubMed ID: 10846136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of projective aspects variations on estimates of changes in bone mass using digital subtraction radiography.
    Loftin R; Webber R; Horton R; Tyndall D; Moriarty J
    J Periodontal Res; 1998 Aug; 33(6):352-8. PubMed ID: 9777586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Digital subtraction radiography for the detection of periodontal bone changes].
    Mera T
    Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi; 1989 Mar; 31(1):129-46. PubMed ID: 2517790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions.
    Parsell DE; Gatewood RS; Watts JD; Streckfus CF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Oct; 86(4):498-502. PubMed ID: 9798239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of three-walled infrabony defects by subtraction radiography.
    Putnins E; Lavelle CL; Holthuis A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Jan; 65(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 3277105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of quantitative digital subtraction radiography for determining changes in calcium mass in mandibular bone: an in vitro study.
    Christgau M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Kolbeck C; Wenzel A
    J Periodontal Res; 1998 Apr; 33(3):138-49. PubMed ID: 9651875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Subtraction radiography for the diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions.
    Gröndahl HG; Gröndahl K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Feb; 55(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 6340017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.