These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10100893)

  • 1. Auditory nerve fiber responses following chronic cochlear de-efferentation.
    Zheng XY; Henderson D; McFadden SL; Ding DL; Salvi RJ
    J Comp Neurol; 1999 Mar; 406(1):72-86. PubMed ID: 10100893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of chronic cochlear de-efferentation on auditory-nerve response.
    Liberman MC
    Hear Res; 1990 Nov; 49(1-3):209-23. PubMed ID: 1705540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of the cochlear efferent system on chronic acoustic trauma.
    Zheng XY; Henderson D; Hu BH; Ding DL; McFadden SL
    Hear Res; 1997 May; 107(1-2):147-59. PubMed ID: 9165355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear microphonics and otoacoustic emissions in chronically de-efferented chinchilla.
    Zheng XY; McFadden SL; Henderson D; Ding DL; Burkard R
    Hear Res; 2000 May; 143(1-2):14-22. PubMed ID: 10771180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory-nerve fibers. III. Tuning curves and thresholds at CF.
    Guinan JJ; Gifford ML
    Hear Res; 1988 Dec; 37(1):29-45. PubMed ID: 3225230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Threshold tuning curves of chinchilla auditory nerve fibers. II. Dependence on spontaneous activity and relation to cochlear nonlinearity.
    Temchin AN; Rich NC; Ruggero MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Nov; 100(5):2899-906. PubMed ID: 18753325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on auditory nerve response to tones in noise.
    Winslow RL; Sachs MB
    J Neurophysiol; 1987 Apr; 57(4):1002-21. PubMed ID: 3585452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency tuning and spontaneous activity in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus magnocellularis of the barn owl Tyto alba.
    Köppl C
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jan; 77(1):364-77. PubMed ID: 9120577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of contralateral sound on auditory-nerve responses. I. Contributions of cochlear efferents.
    Warren EH; Liberman MC
    Hear Res; 1989 Jan; 37(2):89-104. PubMed ID: 2914811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single-tone intensity discrimination based on auditory-nerve rate responses in backgrounds of quiet, noise, and with stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle.
    Winslow RL; Sachs MB
    Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 35(2-3):165-89. PubMed ID: 3198509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural mechanisms of tone-on-tone masking: patterns of discharge rate and discharge synchrony related to rates of spontaneous discharge in the chinchilla auditory nerve.
    Sinex DG; Havey DC
    J Neurophysiol; 1986 Dec; 56(6):1763-80. PubMed ID: 3806187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Delgutte B; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2533-49. PubMed ID: 8120597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regenerated nerve fibers in the noise-damaged chinchilla cochlea are not efferent.
    Strominger RN; Bohne BA; Harding GW
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):52-62. PubMed ID: 8647746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of the cochlear efferent system in acquired resistance to noise-induced hearing loss.
    Zheng XY; Henderson D; McFadden SL; Hu BH
    Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):191-203. PubMed ID: 9119763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Responses of auditory nerve fibers innervating regenerated hair cells after local application of gentamicin at the round window of the cochlea in the pigeon.
    Müller M; Smolders JW
    Hear Res; 1999 May; 131(1-2):153-69. PubMed ID: 10355612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear de-efferentation and impulse noise-induced acoustic trauma in the chinchilla.
    Zheng XY; McFadden SL; Ding DL; Henderson D
    Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 144(1-2):187-95. PubMed ID: 10831877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status.
    Shepherd RK; Javel E
    Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 108(1-2):112-44. PubMed ID: 9213127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physiology of cochlear efferent and afferent neurons: direct comparisons in the same animal.
    Liberman MC
    Hear Res; 1988 Jul; 34(2):179-91. PubMed ID: 3170360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency tuning of basilar membrane and auditory nerve fibers in the same cochleae.
    Narayan SS; Temchin AN; Recio A; Ruggero MA
    Science; 1998 Dec; 282(5395):1882-4. PubMed ID: 9836636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term effects of sectioning the olivocochlear bundle in neonatal cats.
    Walsh EJ; McGee J; McFadden SL; Liberman MC
    J Neurosci; 1998 May; 18(10):3859-69. PubMed ID: 9570815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.