These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10101182)
1. Beneficial mutations, hitchhiking and the evolution of mutation rates in sexual populations. Johnson T Genetics; 1999 Apr; 151(4):1621-31. PubMed ID: 10101182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evolution of Mutation Rates in Rapidly Adapting Asexual Populations. Good BH; Desai MM Genetics; 2016 Nov; 204(3):1249-1266. PubMed ID: 27646140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mutation Rate Evolution in Partially Selfing and Partially Asexual Organisms. Gervais C; Roze D Genetics; 2017 Dec; 207(4):1561-1575. PubMed ID: 28971958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hitchhiking effect of a beneficial mutation spreading in a subdivided population. Kim Y; Maruki T Genetics; 2011 Sep; 189(1):213-26. PubMed ID: 21705748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of selfing on the evolution of sexual reproduction. Xu K Evolution; 2024 May; 78(5):879-893. PubMed ID: 38280201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Selection for sex in finite populations. Roze D J Evol Biol; 2014 Jul; 27(7):1304-22. PubMed ID: 24666571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The advantages of segregation and the evolution of sex. Otto SP Genetics; 2003 Jul; 164(3):1099-118. PubMed ID: 12871918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polygenic Adaptation to an Environmental Shift: Temporal Dynamics of Variation Under Gaussian Stabilizing Selection and Additive Effects on a Single Trait. Thornton KR Genetics; 2019 Dec; 213(4):1513-1530. PubMed ID: 31653678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of population bottlenecks on mutation rate evolution in asexual populations. Raynes Y; Halstead AL; Sniegowski PD J Evol Biol; 2014 Jan; 27(1):161-9. PubMed ID: 24330404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interference Effects of Deleterious and Beneficial Mutations in Large Asexual Populations. Jain K Genetics; 2019 Apr; 211(4):1357-1369. PubMed ID: 30700529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations. Keightley PD; Otto SP Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7107):89-92. PubMed ID: 16957730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The evolution of mutation rates: separating causes from consequences. Sniegowski PD; Gerrish PJ; Johnson T; Shaver A Bioessays; 2000 Dec; 22(12):1057-66. PubMed ID: 11084621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency-dependent selection, beneficial mutations, and the evolution of sex. Peck JR Proc Biol Sci; 1993 Nov; 254(1340):87-92. PubMed ID: 8290613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hazardous Loss of Genetic Diversity through Selective Sweeps in Asexual Populations. Wahl LM; Tanaka MM Am Nat; 2022 Mar; 199(3):313-329. PubMed ID: 35175901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A ruby in the rubbish: beneficial mutations, deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. Peck JR Genetics; 1994 Jun; 137(2):597-606. PubMed ID: 8070669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic hitchhiking and the evolution of reduced genetic activity of the Y sex chromosome. Rice WR Genetics; 1987 May; 116(1):161-7. PubMed ID: 3596229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The evolution of recombination: removing the limits to natural selection. Otto SP; Barton NH Genetics; 1997 Oct; 147(2):879-906. PubMed ID: 9335621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of deleterious alleles on adaptation in asexual populations. Johnson T; Barton NH Genetics; 2002 Sep; 162(1):395-411. PubMed ID: 12242249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A simple expression for the strength of selection on recombination generated by interference among mutations. Roze D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 May; 118(19):. PubMed ID: 33941695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]