These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10101356)
1. [Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis in 1.0 T using 3D phase contrast magnetic resonance angiography and dynamic contrast medium perfusion]. Miller S; Hahn U; Schick F; Nägele T; Duda SH; Eckstein FS; Scheule AM; Claussen CD Rofo; 1999 Feb; 170(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 10101356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gd-enhanced 3D phase-contrast MR angiography and dynamic perfusion imaging in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Miller S; Schick F; Duda SH; Nägele T; Hahn U; Teufl F; Müller-Schimpfle M; Erley CM; Albes JM; Claussen CD Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Nov; 16(9):1005-12. PubMed ID: 9839984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography and stenosis quantification]. Marchand B; Hernandez-Hoyos M; Orkisz M; Douek P J Mal Vasc; 2000 Dec; 25(5):312-320. PubMed ID: 11148391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy and safety of gadodiamide (Gd-DTPA-BMA) in renal 3D-magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): a phase II study. Kittner T; Rudolf J; Fages JF; Legmann P; Aschauer M; Repa I; Alvares MR; Savalegui I; Ittrich H; Geterud K; de Kevviler E; Ayuso J; Lockhart ME; Blum A; Iliasch H; Leisinger G; van Beek EJ; Reid AW; Brown JJ; Yu TC; Flamm SD; Düber C; Judmaier W; Reimer P; Stiskal M; Kramann B; Wolff S; Blankenstein C Eur J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 64(3):456-64. PubMed ID: 17412546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Review of source images is necessary for the evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for renal artery stenosis. Wehrschuetz M; Aschauer M; Portugaller H; Stix A; Wehrschuetz-Sigl E; Hausegger K; Ebner F Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2004; 27(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 15383846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [High resolution contrast-enhanced 3D MR-angiography of renal arteries using parallel imaging (SENSE)]. Walter C; Philippi G; Westerhausen R; Kooijman H; Hoffmann HG; Busch HP Rofo; 2003 Sep; 175(9):1244-50. PubMed ID: 12964081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of gadodiamide-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of renal artery stenosis: results of a phase III multicenter trial. Garovic VD; Achauer MA; Kittner T; Horák D; Sheng R; Stanson AW J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Feb; 31(2):390-7. PubMed ID: 20099352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of dynamic gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Thornton MJ; Thornton F; O'Callaghan J; Varghese JC; O'Brien E; Walshe J; Lee MJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Nov; 173(5):1279-83. PubMed ID: 10541105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Magnetic resonance angiography with contrast media in the study of carotid arteries]. Catalano C; Laghi A; Pediconi F; Fraioli F; Napoli A; Passariello R Radiol Med; 2001; 101(1-2):54-9. PubMed ID: 11360754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Systematic analysis of the geometry of a defined contrast medium bolus--implications for contrast enhanced 3D MR-angiography of thoracic vessels]. Kreitner KF; Kunz RP; Weschler C; Ley S; Krummenauer F; Schreiber WG; Thelen M Rofo; 2005 May; 177(5):646-54. PubMed ID: 15871079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [2D-phase contrast flow evaluation and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for perioperative assessment of internal mammary artery grafts]. Stauder NI; Miller S; Scheule AM; Brechtel K; Eckstein FS; Hahn U; Kramer U; Duda SH; Claussen CD Rofo; 2001 Sep; 173(9):790-7. PubMed ID: 11582557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Renal arteries: angiography with TOF 3D magnetic resonance with and without contrast media (Gd-DTPA)]. Carriero A; Magarelli N; D'Ettorre L; Severini S; Tartaro A; Bonomo L Radiol Med; 1994 Mar; 87(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 8146362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study. Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [MR angiography of peripheral vessels with automatic tracking table technique at 1.0 in comparison with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography]. Oberholzer K; Kreitner KF; Kalden P; Requardt M; Pitton M; Mildenberger P; Thelen M Rofo; 1999 Sep; 171(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 10520335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of single-dose contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in therapy indications in abdominal and iliac arteries. Schaefer PJ; Schaefer FK; Mueller-Huelsbeck S; Both M; Heller M; Jahnke T Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(3):376-82. PubMed ID: 17278036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Time-resolved MR angiography of the renal artery: morphology and perfusion]. Krause UJ; Pabst T; Köstler H; Helbig C; Kenn W; Hahn D Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1170-4. PubMed ID: 12221578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Catheter-directed MR angiography and cross-sectional imaging for the assessment of renal artery stenosis. Omary RA; Schirf BE; Green JD; Kanwar YS; Shea SM; Carroll TJ; Carr J; Li D J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 Feb; 16(2 Pt 1):255-60. PubMed ID: 15713927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Preoperative imaging in 78 living kidney donors using CE-MRA and DSA]. Lemke U; Taupitz M; Klüner C; Giessing M; Schönberger B; Hamm B; Kröncke TJ Rofo; 2008 Jan; 180(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 18092278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]