269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10101357)
1. [Native spiral computerized tomography in patients with acute flank pain--sense or nonsense?].
Ruppert-Kohlmayr AJ; Stacher R; Preidler KW; Zigeuner R; Primus G; Ricabonna M; Szolar DH
Rofo; 1999 Feb; 170(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 10101357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial.
Pfister SA; Deckart A; Laschke S; Dellas S; Otto U; Buitrago C; Roth J; Wiesner W; Bongartz G; Gasser TC
Eur Radiol; 2003 Nov; 13(11):2513-20. PubMed ID: 12898174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography.
Smith RC; Rosenfield AT; Choe KA; Essenmacher KR; Verga M; Glickman MG; Lange RC
Radiology; 1995 Mar; 194(3):789-94. PubMed ID: 7862980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acute ureteral obstruction: value of secondary signs of helical unenhanced CT.
Smith RC; Verga M; Dalrymple N; McCarthy S; Rosenfield AT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1109-13. PubMed ID: 8911160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Unenhanced spiral CT in urolithiasis: indication, performance and interpretation].
Thoeny HC; Hoppe H
Rofo; 2003 Jul; 175(7):904-10. PubMed ID: 12847644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urogram in the evaluation of acute flank pain.
Miller OF; Rineer SK; Reichard SR; Buckley RG; Donovan MS; Graham IR; Goff WB; Kane CJ
Urology; 1998 Dec; 52(6):982-7. PubMed ID: 9836541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnosis of acute flank pain caused by ureteral stones: value of combined direct and indirect signs on IVU and unenhanced helical CT.
Wang LJ; Ng CJ; Chen JC; Chiu TF; Wong YC
Eur Radiol; 2004 Sep; 14(9):1634-40. PubMed ID: 15060838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acute renal colic: value of unenhanced spiral computed tomography compared with intravenous urography.
Wong SK; Ng LG; Tan BS; Cheng CW; Chee CT; Chan LP; Lo HG
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2001 Nov; 30(6):568-72. PubMed ID: 11817281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of spiral computed tomography without contrast media and intravenous urography in the diagnosis of renal colic].
Thibeau JF; Sourtzis S; Bellemans MA; Vandendris M
Prog Urol; 1999 Apr; 9(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 10370946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of intravenous urography (IVU) and unenhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for initial investigation of suspected acute ureterolithiasis.
Eikefjord E; Askildsen JE; Rørvik J
Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):222-9. PubMed ID: 18300151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain.
Dalrymple NC; Verga M; Anderson KR; Bove P; Covey AM; Rosenfield AT; Smith RC
J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):735-40. PubMed ID: 9474137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acute ureteric calculus obstruction: unenhanced spiral CT versus HASTE MR urography and abdominal radiograph.
Regan F; Kuszyk B; Bohlman ME; Jackman S
Br J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 78(930):506-11. PubMed ID: 15900055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can noncontrast helical computed tomography replace intravenous urography for evaluation of patients with acute urinary tract colic?
Chen MY; Zagoria RJ
J Emerg Med; 1999; 17(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 10195491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi.
Yilmaz S; Sindel T; Arslan G; Ozkaynak C; Karaali K; Kabaalioğlu A; Lüleci E
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(2):212-7. PubMed ID: 9477267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intravenous urography in the emergency department: when do we need it?
Richards JR; Christman CA
Eur J Emerg Med; 1999 Jun; 6(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 10461557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urography in the evaluation of acute renal colic.
Wang JH; Shen SH; Huang SS; Chang CY
J Chin Med Assoc; 2008 Jan; 71(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 18218557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost analysis of different protocols for imaging a patient with acute flank pain.
Grisi G; Stacul F; Cuttin R; Rimondini A; Meduri S; Dalla Palma L
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(10):1620-7. PubMed ID: 11044936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unenhanced spiral CT in acute ureteral colic: a replacement for excretory urography?
Ryu JA; Kim B; Jeon YH; Lee J; Lee JW; Jeon SS; Park KH
Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 11752964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative analysis and interobserver variation of unenhanced computed tomography and intravenous urography in the diagnosis of acute flank pain.
Ben Nakhi A; Gupta R; Al-Hunayan A; Muttikkal T; Chavan V; Mohammed A; Ali Y
Med Princ Pract; 2010; 19(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 20134174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unenhanced multi-detector row CT in patients suspected of having urinary stone disease: effect of section width on diagnosis.
Memarsadeghi M; Heinz-Peer G; Helbich TH; Schaefer-Prokop C; Kramer G; Scharitzer M; Prokop M
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):530-6. PubMed ID: 15758192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
