These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10101677)

  • 1. The Baltimore case.
    Fielder JH
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1999; 18(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 10101677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The evolution of the "scientific misconduct" issue: An historical overview.
    Lafollette MC
    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 10964254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Researcher sues government and specific agency official over misconduct investigation.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):9. PubMed ID: 12530382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The 'Gallo case': Popovic strikes back.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5302):920-1. PubMed ID: 9053992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trouble for Healy over misconduct office.
    Aldhous P
    Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6334):361. PubMed ID: 1650429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific misconduct. NIH staffer finds warm reception on other side.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Jan; 355(6356):98. PubMed ID: 1309600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Soft responses to misconduct.
    Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6913):253. PubMed ID: 12447400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robocops: Stewart and Feder's mechanized misconduct search.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1991 Apr; 350(6318):454-5. PubMed ID: 1849615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How congressional pressure shaped the 'Baltimore case'.
    Friedly J
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5277):873-5. PubMed ID: 8711476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethics in research.
    Shamoo AE; Dunigan CD
    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 10964253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imanishi-Kari case. Baltimore defends paper at center of misconduct case.
    Stone R
    Science; 1995 Jul; 269(5221):157. PubMed ID: 7618074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Baltimore affair: a different view.
    Shashok K
    Int Microbiol; 1999 Dec; 2(4):275-8. PubMed ID: 10943425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imanishi-Kari still in limbo.
    Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):1-2. PubMed ID: 8107875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A costly settlement ends whistle-blower suit.
    Taubes G
    Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):605. PubMed ID: 8303265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Misconduct finding in the Gallo case.
    Greenberg D
    Lancet; 1993 Jan; 341(8838):166-7. PubMed ID: 8093759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
    Reynolds GH
    Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ORI finds Imanishi-Kari guilty of misconduct, proposes 10-year ban.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6505):391. PubMed ID: 7984221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific misconduct and research integrity for the bench scientist.
    Pascal CB
    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):220-30. PubMed ID: 10964256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An end to fraud?
    Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6451):95-6. PubMed ID: 8232562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.