These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10101679)
1. The Biomaterials Access Assurance Act of 1998. Walter CF; Richards EP IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1999; 18(2):125-7. PubMed ID: 10101679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of products liability on bulk suppliers of biomaterials. Baker FD Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 10343012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Science in the courtroom. A new approach. Dresser R Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(3):26-7. PubMed ID: 10420302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Patent issue: supplier liability in medical implants and devices: the "Biomaterials Access Assurance Act". Pabst PL; Mills KV Tissue Eng; 2000 Apr; 6(2):189-90. PubMed ID: 10941213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Lohr decision: FDA perspective and position. Porter MJ Food Drug Law J; 1997; 52(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 10346705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Silicone breast implants. Can emerging medical, legal, and scientific concepts be reconciled? Snyder JW J Leg Med; 1997 Jun; 18(2):133-220. PubMed ID: 9230567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The development of implants and implantable materials. DeMane CQ Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Apr; 28(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 7596603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomaterials Access Assurance Act of 1998: a legislative success. Melnick A Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Sep; 22(9):1402-3. PubMed ID: 10527024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Injury control and product liability. Teret S J Public Health Policy; 1981 Mar; 2(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 7298832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The preemptive scope of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976. Sunshine PH Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(1):191-212. PubMed ID: 10342991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical device manufactures of raw materials want protection from liability. Hosp Health Netw; 1994 Jun; 68(11):25. PubMed ID: 8193647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of the new products liability Restatement on prescription products. Schwartz TM Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(3):399-413. PubMed ID: 10343009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Implantable medical devices and products liability. Posner K Med Trial Tech Q; 1982; 28(3):255-78. PubMed ID: 6927801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Premarket approval and federal preemption of product liability claims in the wake of Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr. Jarcho DG Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 11797730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Consumer-directed advertising of contraceptive drugs: the FDA, Depo-Provera, and product liability. Green W Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(4):553-67. PubMed ID: 10343019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomaterials science at a crossroads: are current product liability laws in the United States hampering innovation and the development of safer medical implants? Kohn J Pharm Res; 1996 Jun; 13(6):815-9. PubMed ID: 8792416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]