BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10101998)

  • 1. Relation between hospital surgical volume and outcome for pancreatic resection for neoplasm in a publicly funded health care system.
    Simunovic M; To T; Theriault M; Langer B
    CMAJ; 1999 Mar; 160(5):643-8. PubMed ID: 10101998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In-hospital mortality and morbidity after surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 1996-2000: the effect of hospital and surgeon volume.
    Barker FG; Amin-Hanjani S; Butler WE; Ogilvy CS; Carter BS
    Neurosurgery; 2003 May; 52(5):995-1007; discussion 1007-9. PubMed ID: 12699540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgeon volume impacts hospital mortality for pancreatic resection.
    Eppsteiner RW; Csikesz NG; McPhee JT; Tseng JF; Shah SA
    Ann Surg; 2009 Apr; 249(4):635-40. PubMed ID: 19300225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer.
    Glasgow RE; Mulvihill SJ
    West J Med; 1996 Nov; 165(5):294-300. PubMed ID: 8993200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Associations between hospital and surgeon procedure volumes and patient outcomes after ovarian cancer resection.
    Schrag D; Earle C; Xu F; Panageas KS; Yabroff KR; Bristow RE; Trimble EL; Warren JL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Feb; 98(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 16449676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between hospital volume, system clinical resources, and mortality in pancreatic resection.
    Joseph B; Morton JM; Hernandez-Boussard T; Rubinfeld I; Faraj C; Velanovich V
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Apr; 208(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 19476785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: A follow-up analysis of another decade.
    Gasper WJ; Glidden DV; Jin C; Way LW; Patti MG
    Ann Surg; 2009 Sep; 250(3):472-83. PubMed ID: 19730178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Admission volume determines outcome for patients with acute pancreatitis.
    Singla A; Simons J; Li Y; Csikesz NG; Ng SC; Tseng JF; Shah SA
    Gastroenterology; 2009 Dec; 137(6):1995-2001. PubMed ID: 19733570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. National variation in operative mortality rates for esophageal resection and the need for quality improvement.
    Dimick JB; Cowan JA; Ailawadi G; Wainess RM; Upchurch GR
    Arch Surg; 2003 Dec; 138(12):1305-9. PubMed ID: 14662529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More procedures, better quality of care? Is there a case for regionalization of pancreatic resection for neoplasm?
    Wexler MJ
    CMAJ; 1999 Mar; 160(5):671-3. PubMed ID: 10102002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postoperative complication rates after hepatic resection in Maryland hospitals.
    Dimick JB; Pronovost PJ; Cowan JA; Lipsett PA
    Arch Surg; 2003 Jan; 138(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 12511147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical outcomes following pancreatic resection at a low-volume community hospital: do all patients need to be sent to a regional cancer center?
    Cunningham JD; O'Donnell N; Starker P
    Am J Surg; 2009 Aug; 198(2):227-30. PubMed ID: 19306974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does the participation of a surgical trainee adversely impact patient outcomes? A study of major pancreatic resections in California.
    Hutter MM; Glasgow RE; Mulvihill SJ
    Surgery; 2000 Aug; 128(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 10923006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Major pancreatic resections for suspected cancer in a community-based teaching hospital: lessons learned.
    Metreveli RE; Sahm K; Abdel-Misih R; Petrelli NJ
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 95(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 17323334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between hospital volume and outcomes of esophageal variceal bleeding in the United States.
    Myers RP; Papay KD; Shaheen AA; Kaplan GG
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 6(7):789-98. PubMed ID: 18524688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hip fracture outcomes: does surgeon or hospital volume really matter?
    Browne JA; Pietrobon R; Olson SA
    J Trauma; 2009 Mar; 66(3):809-14. PubMed ID: 19276758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome and cost of craniotomy performed to treat tumors in regional academic referral centers.
    Long DM; Gordon T; Bowman H; Etzel A; Burleyson G; Betchen S; Garonzik IM; Brem H
    Neurosurgery; 2003 May; 52(5):1056-63; discussion 1063-5. PubMed ID: 12699547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Craniotomy for the resection of metastatic brain tumors in the U.S., 1988-2000: decreasing mortality and the effect of provider caseload.
    Barker FG
    Cancer; 2004 Mar; 100(5):999-1007. PubMed ID: 14983496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Higher hospital volume is associated with lower mortality in acute nonvariceal upper-GI hemorrhage.
    Ananthakrishnan AN; McGinley EL; Saeian K
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Sep; 70(3):422-32. PubMed ID: 19560760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pancreatic resection in Veterans Affairs and selected university medical centers: results of the patient safety in surgery study.
    Glasgow RE; Jackson HH; Neumayer L; Schifftner TL; Khuri SF; Henderson WG; Mulvihill SJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jun; 204(6):1252-60. PubMed ID: 17544083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.