53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10102013)
1. [The demonstration of the efficacy of homeopathic drugs].
Strubelt O; Claussen M
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1999 Mar; 124(9):261-6. PubMed ID: 10102013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility of results with homeopathic remedies.
Buckman R
CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1128-9. PubMed ID: 10234340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Homeopathy again: a questionable meta-analysis.
Prescrire Int; 1998 Jun; 7(35):94-5. PubMed ID: 10342930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Proof of the effectiveness of homeopathic drugs].
Linde K
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1999 Oct; 124(41):1221-3. PubMed ID: 10572527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. No efficacy of homeopathy against influenza.
Prescrire Int; 2001 Feb; 10(51):24. PubMed ID: 11503856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Homeopathic arnica: just a placebo.
Prescrire Int; 2001 Oct; 10(55):156. PubMed ID: 11824436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Out of step with the Lancet homeopathy meta-analysis: more objections than objectivity?
Dean M
J Altern Complement Med; 1998; 4(4):389-98. PubMed ID: 9884176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Homeopathic products.
Med Lett Drugs Ther; 1999 Feb; 41(1047):20-1. PubMed ID: 10076593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Homeopathic research after the Lancet meta analysis--a moment for introspection.
Oberbaum M; Singer SR; Frass M
Complement Ther Med; 2005 Dec; 13(4):303-5. PubMed ID: 16338202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Is homeopathy more than a placebo?].
Brockow T; Franke A; Resch KL
Praxis (Bern 1994); 1998 Dec; 87(49):1687-94. PubMed ID: 9887669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Open letter in response to the article in the Lancet.
Swiss Association of Homoeopathic Physicians
Explore (NY); 2006 Jan; 2(1):7. PubMed ID: 16781599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. How to interpret a meta-analysis and judge its value as a guide for clinical practice.
Zlowodzki M; Poolman RW; Kerkhoffs GM; Tornetta P; Bhandari M;
Acta Orthop; 2007 Oct; 78(5):598-609. PubMed ID: 17966018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Debate regarding homeopathic medicine continues.
Imrie R
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1998 Jul; 213(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 9656014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Industry money skews drug overviews.
Giles J
Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7058):458-9. PubMed ID: 16177748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Drawing generalized causal inferences based on meta-analysis.
Matt GE
NIDA Res Monogr; 1997; 170():165-82. PubMed ID: 9154257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-analysis: an update.
Sacks HS; Reitman D; Pagano D; Kupelnick B
Mt Sinai J Med; 1996; 63(3-4):216-24. PubMed ID: 8692168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Meta-analyses in psychopharmacotherapy: garbage in--garbage out?].
Weinmann S
Psychiatr Prax; 2009 Sep; 36(6):255-7. PubMed ID: 19707997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bias resulting from the use of 'assay sensitivity' as an inclusion criterion for meta-analysis.
Gelfand LA; Strunk DR; Tu XM; Noble RE; Derubeis RJ
Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(6):943-55. PubMed ID: 16196080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analysis and meta-analytic monitoring of clinical trials.
Feinstein AR
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1273-80; discussion 1281-3. PubMed ID: 8817801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
Ioannidis JP
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
