135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10102603)
1. 2-D and 3-D reconstructions of spiral computed tomography in localization of the inferior alveolar canal for dental implants.
Yang J; Cavalcanti MG; Ruprecht A; Vannier MW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Mar; 87(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 10102603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accurate linear measurements in the anterior maxilla using orthoradially reformatted spiral computed tomography.
Cavalcanti MG; Yang J; Ruprecht A; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 10740466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of spiral computed tomography for dental implants.
Cavalcanti MG; Yang J; Ruprecht A; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):329-33. PubMed ID: 10895630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images.
Hanazawa T; Sano T; Seki K; Okano T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 15008935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D volume rendering using multislice CT for dental implants.
Cavalcanti MG; Ruprecht A; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 12087438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A precise radiographic method to determine the location of the inferior alveolar canal in the posterior edentulous mandible: implications for dental implants. Part 1: Technique.
Stella JP; Tharanon W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2391135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
Ekestubbe A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determining position of the inferior alveolar nerve via anatomical dissection and micro-computed tomography in preparation for dental implants.
Massey ND; Galil KA; Wilson TD
J Can Dent Assoc; 2013; 79():d39. PubMed ID: 23920072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of panoramic cross-sectional tomography, its ability to identify the inferior alveolar canal, and its impact on estimation of appropriate implant dimensions in the mandibular posterior region.
Mehra A; Pai KM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 19673959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between the position of the mental foramen and the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve as determined by cone beam computed tomography combined with mimics.
Chen Z; Chen D; Tang L; Wang F
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 25299797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of accuracy of computer-aided intraoperative positioning of endosseous oral implants in the edentulous mandible.
Wanschitz F; Birkfellner W; Watzinger F; Schopper C; Patruta S; Kainberger F; Figl M; Kettenbach J; Bergmann H; Ewers R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Feb; 13(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 12005146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Linear tomography's clinical accuracy and validity for presurgical dental implant analysis.
Butterfield KJ; Dagenais M; Clokie C
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 9269023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro correlation of the level of inferior alveolar canal with CBCT imaging.
Balasundaram A; Heir GM; Villegas FP; Ahmad M; Taher F
Surg Radiol Anat; 2015 Aug; 37(6):591-7. PubMed ID: 25470980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of 3 different imaging methods for the localization of the mandibular canal in dental implant planning.
Peker I; Alkurt MT; Michcioglu T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 18700369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A precise radiographic method to determine the location of the inferior alveolar canal in the posterior edentulous mandible: implications for dental implants. Part 2: Clinical application.
Stella JP; Tharanon W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 2391136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region: a second attempt introducing cone beam computed tomography.
Uchida Y; Noguchi N; Goto M; Yamashita Y; Hanihara T; Takamori H; Sato I; Kawai T; Yosue T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):744-50. PubMed ID: 19304029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites.
Todd AD; Gher ME; Quintero G; Richardson AC
J Periodontol; 1993 Dec; 64(12):1243-9. PubMed ID: 8106953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Pre-implantation evaluation using medical imagery: scanner or Scanora?].
Hanssens JF
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 9289749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography.
Besimo CE; Lambrecht JT; Guindy JS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10654036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
