571 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10102607)
1. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement.
Livasy CA; Maygarden SJ; Rajaratnam CT; Novotny DB
Mod Pathol; 1999 Mar; 12(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10102607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (CIN 2 and 3) excised with negative margins by loop electrosurgical excision procedure: the significance of CIN 1 at the margins of excision.
Cardoza-Favarato G; Fadare O
Hum Pathol; 2007 May; 38(5):781-6. PubMed ID: 17316761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins.
Ayhan A; Tuncer HA; Reyhan NH; Kuscu E; Dursun P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():1-6. PubMed ID: 27038228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop conization: is there any predictor for residual disease?
Kietpeerakool C; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Siriaunkgul S; Suprasert P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Oct; 33(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 17845326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Significance of margin and extent of dysplasia in loop electrosurgery excision procedure biopsies performed for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in predicting persistent disease.
Tyler LN; Andrews N; Parrish RS; Hazlett LJ; Korourian S
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2007 Apr; 131(4):622-4. PubMed ID: 17425396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Analysis of recurrence and its influencing factors in patients with cervical HSIL within 24 months after LEEP].
Chen LM; Liu L; Tao X; He Y; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 54(8):534-540. PubMed ID: 31461810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Endocervical glandular involvement, multicentricity, and extent of the disease are features of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Güdücü N; Sidar G; Başsüllü N; Türkmen I; Dünder I
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2013 Aug; 17(4):345-6. PubMed ID: 23665088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of residual/recurrent disease by HPV genotype after loop excision procedure for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with negative margins.
Wu D; Zheng Y; Chen W; Guo C; Yu J; Chen G; Huang Y
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Apr; 51(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 21466511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Diagnosis and treatment value of colposcopy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of 135 cases].
Xiao FY; Wang Q; Zheng RL; Chen M; Su TT; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 51(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 27030497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The clinical significance of a negative loop electrosurgical cone biopsy for high-grade dysplasia.
Livasy CA; Moore DT; Van Le L
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug; 104(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 15291995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Residual and recurrent disease rates following LEEP treatment in high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions.
Baloglu A; Uysal D; Bezircioglu I; Bicer M; Inci A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 282(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 19940997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin after LEEP conization: A retrospective study.
Abdulaziz AMA; You X; Liu L; Sun Y; Zhang J; Sun S; Li X; Sun W; Dong Y; Liu H; Zhang Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 May; 100(20):e26030. PubMed ID: 34011112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Early human papillomavirus testing predicts residual/recurrent disease after LEEP risk factors for predicting residual disease in high-grade squamous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia following LEEP conization].
Niu XY; Feng YK
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Mar; 46(2):321-5. PubMed ID: 25924452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins.
Ayhan A; Boynukalin FK; Guven S; Dogan NU; Esinler I; Usubutun A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endocervical glandular involvement, positive endocervical surgical margin and multicentricity are more often associated with high-grade than low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Kır G; Karabulut MH; Topal CS; Yılmaz MS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1206-10. PubMed ID: 22540878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive margin status in uterine cervix cone specimens is associated with persistent/recurrent high-grade dysplasia.
Shaco-Levy R; Eger G; Dreiher J; Benharroch D; Meirovitz M
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2014 Jan; 33(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 24300540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
