These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10102865)

  • 21. Modelling the impact of opportunistic screening on the sequelae and public healthcare costs of infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in Australian women.
    Ward B; Rodger AJ; Jackson TJ
    Public Health; 2006 Jan; 120(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 16271271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Estimation of the burden of disease and costs of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Canada.
    Tuite AR; Jayaraman GC; Allen VG; Fisman DN
    Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Apr; 39(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 22421691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Summaries for patients. The cost-effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia in women 15 to 29 years of age.
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 Oct; 141(7):I29. PubMed ID: 15466762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Benefit of adjunct universal rectal screening for Chlamydia genital infections in women attending Canadian sexually transmitted infection clinics.
    Thanh NX; Akpinar I; Gratrix J; Plitt S; Smyczek P; Read R; Jacobs P; Wong T; Singh AE
    Int J STD AIDS; 2017 Nov; 28(13):1311-1324. PubMed ID: 28534712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the leukocyte esterase test (LET) as pre-screening test to reduce costs for national population-based Chlamydia trachomatis screening programs.
    Morré SA; Spaargaren J; Veldhuijzen IK; Postma MJ; van Bergen JE; van Bergen JE; Broer J; Coenen AJ; Götz HM; de Groot F; Hoebe CJ; Richardus JH; van Schaik DT; Veldhuijzen IK; Verhooren M;
    J Adolesc Health; 2006 Apr; 38(4):332-3; author reply 333-4. PubMed ID: 16549289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Integrating Chlamydia trachomatis control services for males in female reproductive health programs.
    McConnell JK; Packel L; Biggs MA; Chow JM; Brindis C
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2003; 35(5):226-8. PubMed ID: 14668026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cost effectiveness of home based population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in the UK: economic evaluation of chlamydia screening studies (ClaSS) project.
    Roberts TE; Robinson S; Barton PM; Bryan S; McCarthy A; Macleod J; Egger M; Low N
    BMJ; 2007 Aug; 335(7614):291. PubMed ID: 17656504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection: which target group and at what price?].
    Postma MJ; van den Hoek JA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Jun; 143(23):1237-8. PubMed ID: 10428675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A cost-based decision analysis for Chlamydia screening in California family planning clinics.
    Trachtenberg AI; Washington AE; Halldorson S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jan; 71(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 3122137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Proportional payment for pelvic inflammatory disease: who should pay for chlamydial screening?
    Nettleman MD; Jones RB
    Sex Transm Dis; 1989; 16(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 2667154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors influencing women's views on the acceptability and experience of being opportunistically screened for Chlamydia trachomatis in hospital settings.
    McMillan LE; Norman JE; Murray K; Reid ME
    Int J STD AIDS; 2006 Dec; 17(12):821-5. PubMed ID: 17212859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The cost effectiveness of opportunistic chlamydia screening in England.
    Adams EJ; Turner KM; Edmunds WJ
    Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Jul; 83(4):267-74; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17475686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Health economic methodology illustrated with recent work on Chlamydia screening: the concept of extended dominance.
    Postma MJ; de Vries R; Welte R; Edmunds WJ
    Sex Transm Infect; 2008 Apr; 84(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 18077610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Swedish cost-effectiveness analysis of community-based Chlamydia trachomatis PCR testing of postal urine specimens obtained at home.
    Novak DP; Lindholm L; Jonsson M; Karlsson RB
    Scand J Public Health; 2004; 32(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 15513664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The silent epidemic of Chlamydia: what are we missing here?
    Sanfilippo JS
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 21(5):231-2. PubMed ID: 18794016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
    Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA; Jager JC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):677-81. PubMed ID: 10321301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Systematic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: estimating cost-effectiveness using dynamic modeling and Dutch data.
    de Vries R; van Bergen JE; de Jong-van den Berg LT; Postma MJ;
    Value Health; 2006; 9(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16441519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Seasonality of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections in university women.
    Herold AH; Woodard LJ; Roetzheim RG; Pamies RJ; Young DL; Micceri T
    J Am Coll Health; 1993 Nov; 42(3):117-20. PubMed ID: 8288834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. 'Show me the money': financial incentives increase chlamydia screening rates among tertiary students: a pilot study.
    Currie MJ; Schmidt M; Davis BK; Baynes AM; O'Keefe EJ; Bavinton TP; McNiven M; Martin SJ; Bowden FJ
    Sex Health; 2010 Mar; 7(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 20152098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Chlamydia trachomatis. Screening of pregnant women].
    Skjeldestad FE; Dalen A; Buhaug H; Bakketeig LS
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1987 Sep; 107(25):2129-31. PubMed ID: 3672446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.