These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10104769)
1. Forced medical treatment in pregnancy: resolving the conflicting rights of mother and fetus. Meyer KC Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 10104769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mother v. fetus--the case of "do or die": in re A.C. Snyder DB J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1989; 5():319-37. PubMed ID: 10293012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Refusal of invasive obstetrical intervention and the patient's right law]. Peleg D; Ben-Rafael Z Harefuah; 1997 Jul; 133(1-2):50-1. PubMed ID: 9332060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes. Gallagher A St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Obstetricians, health attorneys, and court-ordered cesarean sections. Samuels TA; Minkoff H; Feldman J; Awonuga A; Wilson TE Womens Health Issues; 2007; 17(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 17403468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Whose rights supersede, those of the patient or those of the unborn fetus? Cady RF JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul; 1999 Mar; 1(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 10823985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive rights and the medical care system: a plea for rational health policy. Stephenson PA; Wagner MG J Public Health Policy; 1993; 14(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 8408608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Protecting the liberty of pregnant patients. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 1987 May; 316(19):1213-4. PubMed ID: 3574372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Inside the womb, outside the law. Murphy D Nurs Times; 1998 Jun 10-16; 94(23):32. PubMed ID: 9687751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mother's rights prevail: In re A.C. and the status of forced obstetrical intervention in the District of Columbia. Neale H J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Jul; 23(7):208-13. PubMed ID: 10105493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion update. Address to National Society of Genetic Counselors Annual Meeting, November 11, 1989, Baltimore, Maryland. Rogers EH Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser; 1990; 26(3):73-5. PubMed ID: 2092859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The abortion alternative and the patient's right to know. Shapiro SC Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1979 Dec; (10):5-48. PubMed ID: 10295000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses. Warren MA Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions. Orentlicher D Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2603860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forensic implications and medical-legal dilemmas of maternal versus fetal rights. Mohaupt SM; Sharma KK J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):985-92. PubMed ID: 9729816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Who gets to choose? Responses to the foetal/maternal conflict. Hyams R E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E7. PubMed ID: 16969923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]