These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10105609)

  • 1. Summary of California law regarding life support issues.
    Hartz JN
    HEC Forum; 1990; 2(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 10105609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Substitute consent. Reconciling negative treatment and consent to routine medical treatment.
    Sappington GM
    J Leg Med; 1986 Sep; 7(3):341-55. PubMed ID: 3490528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Right-to-die issues in Minnesota.
    Klein JE
    Minn Med; 1991 Apr; 74(4):33-6. PubMed ID: 1875875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cruzan and the demands of due process.
    Haddad ME
    Issues Law Med; 1992; 8(2):205-28. PubMed ID: 1399496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health.
    Barton RS
    Issues Law Med; 1991; 6(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 1903782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Life-sustaining treatment and the law: the evolution of informed consent, advance directives and surrogate decision making.
    Monahan JT; Lawhorn EA
    Ann Health Law; 2010; 19(1 Spec No):107-13. PubMed ID: 21495557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surrogate decisions in New York State on sustaining life.
    Rouse F
    Mt Sinai J Med; 1991 Oct; 58(5):379-81; discussion 398-402. PubMed ID: 1753970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Westhart v. Mule.
    Bourke LH
    Issues Law Med; 1991; 6(4):429-30. PubMed ID: 1903784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mrs. Wanglie and "doctor knows best" and making decisions for those who cannot decide for themselves: autonomy in two recent cases.
    Rouse F
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 1342345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. California's durable power of attorney for health care.
    Winslade WJ; Ross JW; Towers B
    Mobius; 1984 Apr; 4(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 10266730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Withholding food and water from a patient--should it be condoned in California?
    Harber SM
    Pac Law J; 1985 Apr; 16(3):877-93. PubMed ID: 11652432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discontinuing life support in comatose patients: an example from Canadian case law.
    Godlovitch G; Mitchell I; Doig CJ
    CMAJ; 2005 Apr; 172(9):1172-3. PubMed ID: 15851705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Euthanasia without request--euthanasia in impaired judgment].
    Lauter H
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1993 Jan; 87(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 8442366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reflections on non-heartbeating organ donation: how 3 years of experience affected the University of Pittsburgh's Ethics Committee's actions.
    DeVita M; Snyder JV
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1996; 5(2):285-92; discussion 292-9. PubMed ID: 8718738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The law, professional responsibility, and decisions to forego treatment.
    Nelson LJ
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1986 Jan; 12(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 3083320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Termination of life support systems in the elderly. Discussion: To die before the gods please: legal issues surrounding euthanasia and the elderly.
    Baron CH
    J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1981; 14(1):45-70. PubMed ID: 7343584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incompetent residents and consent: issues and concerns.
    Lutz RM
    Provider; 1989 Dec; 15(12):20-1. PubMed ID: 10296601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The physician's experience: elderly patients.
    Meier DE
    Mt Sinai J Med; 1991 Oct; 58(5):385-7; discussion 398-402. PubMed ID: 1753973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Doctrine of consent poses questions in terminating life support system. Part 2.
    Weissburg C; Hartz JN
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1979; 12(5):38-41. PubMed ID: 10244575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The aftermath of the Cruzan case in the United States.
    Harvey JC
    Diskussionsforum Med Ethik; 1993; (9-10):LII-LIV. PubMed ID: 8012269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.