These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10105837)
1. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law. Miller DH Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1990 Jul; (137):7-38. PubMed ID: 10105837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law. Miller DH Denver Univ Law Rev; 1988; 65(2-3):181-212. PubMed ID: 11659201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no? O'Brien EJ Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. What medicine and the law should do for the physician-assisted suicide debate. Fins JJ CCAR J; 1997; 44(2):46-53. PubMed ID: 15712422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Financial penalties for failing to honor patient wishes to refuse treatment. Gasner MR St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11():499-520. PubMed ID: 16047426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. I have a conscience, too: the plight of medical personnel confronting the right to die. Loftus IP Notre Dame Law Rev; 1990; 65(4):699-730. PubMed ID: 16044606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Guidelines for state court decision making in life-sustaining medical treatment cases. Hafemeister TL Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):443-75. PubMed ID: 1563938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Foreword: can Glucksberg survive Lawrence? Another look at the end of life and personal autonomy. Kamisar Y Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1453-78. PubMed ID: 18595210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia. Davidson SI N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Damage actions for nonconsensual life-sustaining medical treatment. Dooling RP Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1987 Nov; 9(5):7-30. PubMed ID: 10284752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Physician-assisted suicide and the right to die with assistance. Harv Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 105(8):2021-40. PubMed ID: 10119163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Developments in foregoing life-sustaining treatment. Scofield GR Healthspan; 1989 Mar; 6(3):3-7. PubMed ID: 10292566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Death, privacy, and the free exercise of religion. Stacy T Cornell Law Rev; 1992 Mar; 77(3):490-595. PubMed ID: 10117969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A matter of life and death: pregnancy clauses in living will statutes. Dyke MC Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 70(5):867-87. PubMed ID: 12186075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Cruzan case: who has the right to decide? Johnson SH Health Prog; 1989 Nov; 70(9):22-5. PubMed ID: 10313361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail. McLean ED Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Life and death after Cruzan: recent developments in right to die cases. Elliott SJ Healthspan; 1992; 9(7):12-6. PubMed ID: 10121439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law. Bopp J; Avila D Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the Constitution a suicide pact? Avila D Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 35(1):201-59. PubMed ID: 12385308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Borrowed lessons: the role of ethical distinctions in framing law on life-sustaining treatment. Capron AM Ariz State Law J; 1984; 1984(4):647-60. PubMed ID: 16184674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]