These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10106137)
21. Ends and means of life: the Supreme Court and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration. Feenan D J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(5):152, 151. PubMed ID: 11657627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Clear and convincing evidence: the case of Nancy Cruzan. McCormick RA Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 16038076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Nancy Cruzan is allowed to die, but uncertainties remain. Fry ST Nurs Outlook; 1991; 39(2):96. PubMed ID: 1997971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Family law--guardians of incompetent persons can refuse life-prolonging treatment for their wards. Gilman GS Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1978; 12(4):1039-57. PubMed ID: 11662777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Withholding life support treatment in Illinois--Part I. Hodgman DR; Frazer QR Ill Bar J; 1984 Oct; 73(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 11658588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan. Bennett SA Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. In the matter of Carrie A. Coons. Issues Law Med; 1993; 9(2):177-87. PubMed ID: 8225940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Death, privacy, and the free exercise of religion. Stacy T Cornell Law Rev; 1992 Mar; 77(3):490-595. PubMed ID: 10117969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Shifting the burden of proof. Davis DS Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):31-6. PubMed ID: 10123472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The lessons of Quinlan. Drane JF Health Prog; 1986; 67(6):19-23. PubMed ID: 10277355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Physician willingness to withhold tube feeding after Cruzan: an empirical study. Peters PG; Ely JW; Zweig SC; Elder NC; Schneider FD Miss Law Rev; 1992; 57():831-48. PubMed ID: 11654076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. In the Matter of Claire C. Conroy, No. A-108 (N.J. Jan. 17, 1985). Devlin MM J Med Pract Manage; 1985 Oct; 1(2):136-9. PubMed ID: 10312027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail. McLean ED Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. New Jersey Supreme Court outlines standards for treatment withdrawal. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1985 Feb; 8(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 10269746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Sounding board. The New York Court of appeals rules on the rights of incompetent dying patients. The conclusion of the Brother Fox case. Paris JJ N Engl J Med; 1981 Jun; 304(23):1424-5. PubMed ID: 7231467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Surrogate decision-making legislation: the next frontier in life-sustaining treatment policy. Portman RM J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Oct; 24(10):311-9. PubMed ID: 10114557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Appointment qualification: In re Schmidt. Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1998; 22(6):739-40. PubMed ID: 11657919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. In re Estate of Sidney Greenspan. Bourke LH Issues Law Med; 1991; 6(4):415-9. PubMed ID: 1903783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]