201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10107135)
1. Cruzan: right to die questions unanswered.
Scofield GR
Healthspan; 1990 Sep; 7(8):16-20. PubMed ID: 10107135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Lessons from Cruzan.
Meisel A
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 2132020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Indiana's living will after Cruzan.
Nocon JJ
Indiana Med; 1990 Nov; 83(11):832-4. PubMed ID: 2262676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
McLean ED
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients.
Gottlich V
Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cruzan and caring for others.
Lynn J; Glover J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 2228576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changing attitudes in Florida's 'right to die' law.
Grimes GK
Stetson Law Rev; 1985; 14(2):375-95. PubMed ID: 16100801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Perspectives. Life and death after Cruzan.
Bredder R
Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1991 Jan; 45(2):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10108339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Decisions at the end of life: implications following Cruzan.
Kyba FN
Tex Nurs; 1991 Feb; 65(2):13-4, 16. PubMed ID: 1998169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Right to die after Cruzan: Florida upholds living wills.
Margolis RE
Healthspan; 1990 Nov; 7(10):22-3. PubMed ID: 10107735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "Wrongful living": resuscitation as tortious interference with a patient's right to give informed refusal.
Knapp WC; Hamilton F
North KY Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):253-76. PubMed ID: 16044603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Persistent vegetative state and the right to die: the United States and Britain.
Jennett B; Dyer C
BMJ; 1991 May; 302(6787):1256-8. PubMed ID: 2043853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The right to die and the living will: Missouri status.
Gloe DS
Crit Care Nurse; 1991 Jan; 11(1):26-7, 30. PubMed ID: 1988246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Advance directives: an overview of changing right-to-die laws.
Fade AE
J Nurs Law; 1995; 2(3):27-38. PubMed ID: 12545976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Right to die, forced to live: Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
Gisleson JK
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():401-11. PubMed ID: 10183483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of the clear and convincing standard of proof in right to die cases.
Forte DF
Issues Law Med; 1992; 8(2):183-203. PubMed ID: 1399495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Living wills and the right to die.
Wallach SJ; Crabtree JP
Hawaii Med J; 1990 Dec; 49(12):461-4. PubMed ID: 2286520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Living wills: the need for uniform state laws.
Warnock HC
Probate Prop; 1991; 5(3):52-6. PubMed ID: 11652620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Cruzan decision: an ethical perspective.
Drane JF
Pa Med; 1990 Dec; 93(12):24-7. PubMed ID: 2274332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of families as surrogate decisionmakers after Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
Rushton CH; Hogue EE
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():219-38. PubMed ID: 10111247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
