187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10107358)
1. The physician's role: respecting a patient's right to live or die.
Silver MR; Silver LD
Internist; 1990 Oct; 31(9):12-4, 15. PubMed ID: 10107358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Advance directives 1991: is the cart before the horse?
Rodriguez G; Saultz J
W V Med J; 1992 Feb; 88(2):57-8. PubMed ID: 1557908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Advance directives: principles, problems, and solutions for physicians.
Hoffman BF; Humniski A
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1997 Apr; 30(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 12382657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
Tarantino LM
Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The problem with advance directives: maybe it is the medium, not the message.
Moseley R; Dobalian A; Hatch R
Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2005; 41(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 15899529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An emergency physician's perspective on death with dignity.
Holschuh FC
Hawaii Med J; 1996 Dec; 55(12):252-4. PubMed ID: 9009450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. End-of-life decision making: what we don't know, we make up; what we do know, we ignore.
Johnson SH
Indiana Law Rev; 1998; 31(1):13-47. PubMed ID: 12199229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Who is wise enough to decide who dies?
Boyle JF
Internist; 1988 Apr; 29(4):38-9. PubMed ID: 10287123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Shepherding the patient's right to self-determination. The physician's dawning role.
McIntyre KM
Arch Intern Med; 1992 Feb; 152(2):259-61. PubMed ID: 1739349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The right to die versus the right to live--who decides? The long and wandering road to a legislative solution.
Mazzeo KE
Albany Law Rev; 2002-2003; 66(1):263-87. PubMed ID: 12484391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The right to die.
Guyther JR
Md State Med J; 1973 Jun; 22(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 11661024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1996 Jun; (208):9-75. PubMed ID: 10158433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology.
Richardson E
Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Alzheimer's: decisions in terminal care.
Cassel CK; Hays JR; Lynn J
Patient Care; 1991 Nov; 25(18):125-37. PubMed ID: 11659603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Triggers for advance directives. Part Two.
Waun JE
Mich Med; 1999 Jan; 98(1):42-3. PubMed ID: 9951264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Talking, advance directives, and medical practice.
Loewy EH; Carlson RW
Arch Intern Med; 1994 Oct; 154(20):2265-7. PubMed ID: 7944849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Discontinuation of mechanical ventilation at end-of-life: the ethical and legal boundaries of physician conduct in termination of life support.
Szalados JE
Crit Care Clin; 2007 Apr; 23(2):317-37, xi. PubMed ID: 17368174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics cultivated, not legislated.
Miles F
Provider; 1995 Oct; 21(10):115-6. PubMed ID: 10152215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The ultimate decision.
Malcolm AH
N Y Times Mag; 1989 Dec; ():38-41, 50, 54-5. PubMed ID: 11646318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Initiating discussions about advance directives: the family physician's role.
Sypher B
Am Fam Physician; 2002 Jun; 65(12):2443-4. PubMed ID: 12086236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
