These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10107402)

  • 1. Protecting hospitals from judicial narrowing of state peer review statutes.
    Lending RM
    Healthspan; 1990 Oct; 7(9):8-11. PubMed ID: 10107402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertainty and unpredictability in application of peer review privileges statutes.
    Hicks JT
    J Health Hosp Law; 1991 May; 24(5):137-43, 167. PubMed ID: 10110682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hospital peer review committees: privileges of confidentiality and immunity.
    Butler RE
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1983 Sep; 5(7):7-31. PubMed ID: 10262536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discoverability and admissibility of medical staff committee records: a state-by-state analysis.
    Roach WH
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Sep; 2(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 10252569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protection from discovery of hospital peer review committee records.
    Peterson RN
    Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Jul; 13(7):6-12. PubMed ID: 10267927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Confidentiality vs. the need to know.
    Bernstein AH
    Hospitals; 1981 Sep; 55(17):41-2, 47. PubMed ID: 7275045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality hospitals: the legal privilege legislation & implications for clinicians.
    George PT
    Aust Clin Rev; 1990; 10(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 2078152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Professional Standards Review Organization: some problems of confidentiality.
    Springer EW
    Utah Law Rev; 1975; 1975(2):361-80. PubMed ID: 11658319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical peer review: the need to organize a protective approach.
    Mills DH
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 10121880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The tort liability of hospital ethics committees.
    Merritt AL
    South Calif Law Rev; 1987 Jul; 60(5):1239-97. PubMed ID: 11658947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comment: Peer review privilege established by Illinois Medical Studies Act does not extend to investigations undertaken by hospital administrations.
    Mustes JJ; Popovits RM
    J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Aug; 21(8):191-4. PubMed ID: 10288421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 2003 Schwartz Award. Pitfalls of peer review. The limited protections of state and federal peer review law for physicians.
    Nijm LM
    J Leg Med; 2003 Dec; 24(4):541-56. PubMed ID: 14660324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. State level expert review committees--are they protected?
    Wright RF; Smith JC
    Public Health Rep; 1990; 105(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 2106700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Federal Appeals Court reverses lower Court ruling; reaffirms immunity for hospitals and physicians in peer review cases.
    Leiker M
    WMJ; 2008 Nov; 107(7):344-6. PubMed ID: 19180875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hospital committee records open to discovery.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1988 Sep; 44(4):39-40. PubMed ID: 10290478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Texas Appellate Court decision on privileged information/disclosure discussed.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1986 Sep; 42(4):34, 39. PubMed ID: 10279558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discoverability of peer review committee records.
    Roach WH
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Jun; 4(4):83-5. PubMed ID: 10266787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MD defames colleague in staff committee meeting.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1979 Sep; 60(9):96,98. PubMed ID: 468199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Important provisions of Act 766 of 2013 (Arkansas Peer Review Fairness Act).
    Wroten D
    J Ark Med Soc; 2013 Sep; 110(4):52. PubMed ID: 24079051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What's new with peer review?
    Morrow JA
    Mo Med; 1995 Dec; 92(12):723-6. PubMed ID: 8587563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.