These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10107512)

  • 1. Austin v. McNamara: immunity from suit under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Chenen AR
    Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(4):49-51. PubMed ID: 10107512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality improvement act gets first antitrust test.
    Barnes CE
    Physician Exec; 1990; 16(4):36-8. PubMed ID: 10113358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AHA files amicus in Austin v. McNamara.
    Rothschild IS
    J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Oct; 23(10):319-20. PubMed ID: 10107476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Austin v. McNamara: antitrust immunity for peer review under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Herzog JP; Fisher DR
    Med Staff Couns; 1993; 7(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 10183844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is this ruling really a boost for peer review immunity?
    Thomas MC
    Med Econ; 1990 Nov; 67(23):93-4, 97, 100-1. PubMed ID: 10108713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antitrust immunity granted in a far-reaching peer review case. Austin v. McNamara.
    Kadzielski MA
    Health Prog; 1993; 74(1):19, 29. PubMed ID: 10183820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Court cases testing scope of federal law's peer review immunity.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1992 Aug; 22(34):80. PubMed ID: 10119842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The antitrust laws and the medical peer review process.
    Hammack JM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():419-50. PubMed ID: 10126945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: an overview of its immunity provisions.
    Miles JJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):1-9. PubMed ID: 10284641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) protecting peer review from antitrust claims?
    Cross LL
    Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 10127301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Court grants HCQIA immunity in antitrust suit by physician. Smith v. Ricks.
    Hershey N
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1993 Jun; 10(8):3-5. PubMed ID: 10183876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Austin decision good news for peer reviewers.
    Hudson T
    Hospitals; 1993 Jan; 67(2):46-8. PubMed ID: 8419281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hospital and doctors granted antitrust immunity in important peer review lawsuit. Austin v. McNamara.
    Kadzielski MA
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1993 Feb; 8(2):8-12. PubMed ID: 10183829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To review or not to review: antitrust liabilities and peer review protections.
    Acevedo LJ
    J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):321-36, 351-2. PubMed ID: 10138598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antitrust immunity in Colorado peer review actions.
    Earnest GL
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 Dec; 7(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 10296371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementing the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Pugsley SC
    Leg Med; 1990; ():217-42. PubMed ID: 2130197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementing the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Pugsley SC
    J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Feb; 23(2):42-52. PubMed ID: 10106379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Antitrust. Is quality review in jeopardy?
    Pollner F
    Med World News; 1988 Jun; 29(12):34-6, 38, 43-7. PubMed ID: 10287973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A conflict of interest: why peer review committees need heightened scrutiny under federal antitrust law.
    Rakestraw E
    J Leg Med; 2009; 30(4):563-78. PubMed ID: 19953408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ninth Circuit clarifies immunity requirements and puts more teeth into the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Fogel PD; Phillips EJ
    J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):337-40, 352. PubMed ID: 10138599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.