These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10107512)

  • 21. Data bank has operational impact. Proper peer review can protect hospitals from antitrust and defamation suits.
    Purtell DL
    Health Prog; 1990 Nov; 71(9):66-71. PubMed ID: 10107457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Court upholds law's immunities in peer review cases.
    Kadzielski MA
    Health Prog; 1990; 71(6):21, 31. PubMed ID: 10105569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Implementation of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the future of peer review.
    Trostorff DL
    Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(2):23-31. PubMed ID: 10106574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: does the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine apply?
    Meghrigian AG
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10116795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. California court clarifies medical staff hearing procedures.
    Christensen JD
    Health Law Vigil; 1988 Apr; 11(9):7-8. PubMed ID: 10286816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The impact of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act on peer review.
    Strama B
    Healthspan; 1990 Oct; 7(9):12-7. PubMed ID: 10107396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: a view from the Federal Trade Commission.
    Horoschak MJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):17-24. PubMed ID: 10116790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Medical staff credentialing: a prescription for reducing antitrust liability.
    Peters BM; Maneval WC
    Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):120-33. PubMed ID: 1895761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality assurance implications of federal peer review laws. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the National Practitioner Data Bank.
    Snelson E
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1992; 7(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 1603858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Peer review: the struggle goes on.
    Hollowell EE; Wilson RL; Graves DC
    Leg Med; 1989; ():181-200. PubMed ID: 2700006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Federal laws govern the conduct of peer review.
    Devlin MM
    Am J Med Qual; 1992; 7(3):88-90. PubMed ID: 1493383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The emerging trend of corporate liability: courts' uneven treatment of hospital standards leaves hospitals uncertain and exposed.
    Rutchik DH
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1995 Feb; (192):9-45. PubMed ID: 10144587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. New peer review law provides immunity with obligations.
    Valiant C
    Physician Exec; 1987; 13(3):26-7. PubMed ID: 10312139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 (HCQIA).
    Wecht CH
    Leg Med; 1991; ():269-85. PubMed ID: 1821897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 18 months.
    Puryear MA; Politzer RM; Anderson J; Mullan F
    Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10125933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: reporting practitioner malpractice and discipline.
    McNair RM
    Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):10-8. PubMed ID: 10284642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 1986 Quality Improvement Act: a step in the right direction.
    Kadzielski MA
    Health Prog; 1987 Jun; 68(5):22, 24. PubMed ID: 10282290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986].
    Cruz ML
    Bol Asoc Med P R; 1990 Nov; 82(11):501-4. PubMed ID: 2076141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hospital liability for defamation of character during the peer review process: sticks and stones may break my bones, but words may cost me my job.
    Oliverio J
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Sep; (151):7-28. PubMed ID: 10114742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Supreme Court expands view of interstate commerce in peer review proceeding.
    Neugebauer JE
    Physician Exec; 1991; 17(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 10183511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.