These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10108113)

  • 1. Protesters rise in Cruzan case.
    Wagner L
    Mod Healthc; 1990 Dec 24-31; 20(51):4. PubMed ID: 10108113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Euthanasia and the right to die: Nancy Cruzan and New Mexico.
    Schwartz RL
    N M Law Rev; 1990; 20(3):675-700. PubMed ID: 12186059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The unconstitutional treatment of Nancy Cruzan.
    Gasner MR
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1990; 7(Part 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 16044596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perspectives. High court tackles right-to-die.
    Olson E
    Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1989 Aug; 43(31):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10294181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The constitutional dimensions of the right to refuse medically assisted nutrition and hydration: an analysis of Cruzan.
    Karbal W
    J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):241-8, 256. PubMed ID: 10113286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
    McLean ED
    Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Withdrawal of nutrition and hydration from an incompetent patient: legal developments leading to Cruzan.
    Garvey MA
    J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):225-40, 255. PubMed ID: 10113285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cruzan family's determination spurs patient self-determination.
    Hosp Ethics; 1991; 7(1):2. PubMed ID: 10108528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The state's interest in the preservation of life: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
    Peters PG
    Ohio State Law J; 1989; 50(4):891-977. PubMed ID: 16044607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Whose right to die? The Supreme Court will wrestle with the ultimate question.
    Sanders AL
    Time; 1989 Dec; 134(24):80. PubMed ID: 10296083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Cruzan case: an update.
    Seiden DJ; Reinach CS
    Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1990; 23(6):41-2. PubMed ID: 10107714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia.
    Davidson SI
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Cruzan case--no right to die.
    Fiesta J
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Sep; 21(9):22. PubMed ID: 2402372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nancy Cruzan and the right to die.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 1990 Sep; 323(10):670-3. PubMed ID: 2385271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Introduction: the right to die after Cruzan.
    Hoffmann DE
    Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11651214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New ruling draws Cruzan case to a close but leaves heated ethical debate.
    Hosp Patient Relat Rep; 1991 Jan; 6(1):3. PubMed ID: 10112076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comment: the Supreme Court faces the quest of withdrawal of hydration and nutrition: Cruzan v. Missouri Department of Health.
    Craig P
    J Health Hosp Law; 1989 Dec; 22(12):375-9. PubMed ID: 10296700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of families as surrogate decisionmakers after Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
    Rushton CH; Hogue EE
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():219-38. PubMed ID: 10111247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cruzan reconsidered.
    Nelson HL
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 2004903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients.
    Gottlich V
    Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.