These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10108252)
1. Antitrust liability of pharmacists involved with quality assurance programs. O'Brien PC Hosp Pharm; 1990 Dec; 25(12):1115, 1118. PubMed ID: 10108252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Legal issues in managed care for hospital pharmacists. Vogenberg FR; Pisano DJ Hosp Pharm; 1995 Sep; 30(9):808, 811-2, 814. PubMed ID: 10151284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Is HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) protecting peer review from antitrust claims? Cross LL Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 10127301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The antitrust laws and the medical peer review process. Hammack JM J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():419-50. PubMed ID: 10126945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: does the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine apply? Meghrigian AG Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10116795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meeting the peer review challenge. Waxman JM Health Syst Rev; 1991; 24(5):38-40. PubMed ID: 10113815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. They just don't get it. Hackney VH; Le Grand AC Hosp Law Newsl; 1992 Dec; 10(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 10122732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review: federal and state protection. Kennedy KE Minn Med; 1996 Mar; 79(3):52-4. PubMed ID: 8839070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Court cases testing scope of federal law's peer review immunity. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1992 Aug; 22(34):80. PubMed ID: 10119842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: a view from the Federal Trade Commission. Horoschak MJ Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):17-24. PubMed ID: 10116790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hospitals, pharmacists share equivalent responsibilities and liabilities for actions. Part 2. Decker R Hosp Mater Manage; 1991 Oct; 16(10):22-3. PubMed ID: 10115102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. To review or not to review: antitrust liabilities and peer review protections. Acevedo LJ J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):321-36, 351-2. PubMed ID: 10138598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal and medical issues in therapeutic interchange: implications for pharmacists, physicians, and P & T committees. Plumeri PA; Crane VS Hosp Formul; 1992 Oct; 27(10):1040-2, 1047-8. PubMed ID: 10121419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Legal liability of a hospital for its pharmacy. Proctor PA Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1982 Aug; 4(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 10256597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Pharmacists have more responsibilities, liabilities than hospital materials managers. Part 1. Decker R Hosp Mater Manage; 1991 Sep; 16(9):22-3. PubMed ID: 10114529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When do hospital pharmacists violate antitrust laws? Decker R Hosp Purch Manage; 1980 Mar; 5(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 10245413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Hospital liability: a compelling case for comprehensive D&O insurance. Lapin D; Owen J Trustee; 1992 Apr; 45(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 10117314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Austin v. McNamara: antitrust immunity for peer review under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Herzog JP; Fisher DR Med Staff Couns; 1993; 7(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 10183844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]