These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10108473)
1. Healthcare law firms find malpractice verdict 'chilling'. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1991 Jan; 21(2):39. PubMed ID: 10108473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Professional Standards Review Organization: imposition of sanctions on health care practitioners and providers of health care services--proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1978 Oct; 43(199):47473-7. PubMed ID: 10297254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Health care programs: fraud and abuse; amendments to OIG exclusion and CMP authorities resulting from Public Law 100-93--HHS. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1992 Jan; 57(19):3298-358. PubMed ID: 10116684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health Care Financing Administration--imposition of sanctions on health care practitioners and providers of health care services; program integrity. Final regulation. Fed Regist; 1980 Feb; 45(35):11436-41. PubMed ID: 10297687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Problems of liability in medical law]. Maassen W Urologe A; 2007 Aug; 46(8):870-5. PubMed ID: 17639292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Uncle Sam's written invitation to sue you. Stevens C Med Econ; 1987 Mar; 64(6):32-7. PubMed ID: 10281011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A 20-year experience with malpractice screening panels. Kridelbaugh WW; Palmisano DJ Bull Am Coll Surg; 1997 May; 82(5):21-3. PubMed ID: 10167808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A discussion of medical malpractice and cesarean section. Berkman H Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1993 Apr; (170):9-30. PubMed ID: 10125422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical malpractice: thinking about the federal role. Blumstein JF J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1989; 12(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 10296434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Statutory protection for peer review committees--can it be waived? Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1988 Jul; 77(7):586-7. PubMed ID: 3171431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Illinois Supreme Court upholds constitutionality of state peer review act. Peterson RN Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jun; 7(13):3-4. PubMed ID: 10273522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical review organizations: a model state immunity statute. Kopit WG; Shapiro LE; Eaton KB Group Pract; 1980 Apr; 29(4):17-20. PubMed ID: 10273186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medicolegal--Malpractice and ethical issues in radiology. Overdiagnosis, false-positive findings, and malpractice. Berlin L AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Nov; 203(5):W549. PubMed ID: 25341170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Malpractice liability and PSRO. Part I. Cowles JM Hosp Admin Curr; 1975 Dec; 19(8):1-4. PubMed ID: 10273066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Bivens actions not allowed against peer review organizations. Margolis RE Healthspan; 1994 Feb; 11(2):17-8. PubMed ID: 10132989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Follow up on Emory University v. Houston. Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1988 Oct; 77(10):782-3. PubMed ID: 3183541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. HHS Inspector General's Office augments PRO monitoring of Medicare abuses. Kusserow RP Health Manage Q; 1984-1985 Winter; ():10-1. PubMed ID: 10311022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. PSROs: implications for legal liability. Springer EW Hosp Med Staff; 1975 Jan; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10273071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. PRO release of medical information. Implications for Missouri physicians and hospitals. Akhter MN Mo Med; 1985 Nov; 82(11):695-7. PubMed ID: 4069102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]