These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10108567)

  • 1. Class dismissed!
    QRC Advis; 1990 Jul; 6(9):1-4. PubMed ID: 10108567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. HCFA quality intervention plan does not fit training programs.
    Lang DA
    QRC Advis; 1990 Jul; 6(9):5. PubMed ID: 10108569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medicare and Medicaid programs; Utilization and Quality Control Peer Review Organization (PRO); correction--HCFA.
    Fed Regist; 1985 Oct; 50(200):41886-7. PubMed ID: 10300452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What the toughest of the PROs is doing to doctors.
    Frederick L
    Med Econ; 1985 Jul; 62(15):76-83. PubMed ID: 10300192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review organizations may increase Inspector General's sanction activity.
    Sax BM
    Health Law Vigil; 1985 Sep; 8(18):15-7. PubMed ID: 10300320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disclosure of information to and by peer review organizations.
    Hawthorne KJ
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1988 Sep; 9(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 10302725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A PRO report card.
    Webber AH
    Internist; 1986 Jul; 27(6):7-9. PubMed ID: 10301023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. KePRO shoots for excellence times six.
    Oh J
    Pa Med; 1999 Sep; 102(9):13. PubMed ID: 10509097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perspectives. Peer review of ambulatory care.
    Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1987 Sep; 41(35):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10301883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PROs find role beyond Medicare cop.
    Gardner J
    Mod Healthc; 1997 Jun; 27(23):38. PubMed ID: 10167932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review organizations and skilled nursing facilities.
    Teplitzky SV; Demaree LA
    Healthspan; 1989 Feb; 6(2):4-8. PubMed ID: 10303237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Blizzard of paperwork, new rules are burying PROs and hospitals.
    Baldwin MF; Fackelmann KA
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Jan; 16(1):46-50, 54. PubMed ID: 10300520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bill continues funding for peer review organizations (PROs).
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1983 May; 8(5):59. PubMed ID: 10273352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perspectives. PROs: modification and expansion.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1985 Aug; 39(33):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10300446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PRO fund cut seen with alarm.
    Weissenstein E
    Mod Healthc; 1992 Feb; 22(6):44. PubMed ID: 10116213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PRO limited review creates controversy, heavy workload.
    Johnsson J
    Contract Healthc; 1988 Sep; ():34-6. PubMed ID: 10302948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increased scrutiny, expanded role ahead for PROs.
    Mowll CA
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1989 May; 43(5):16, 20, 22. PubMed ID: 10303377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. HCFA evaluation, rankings anger PSRO officials.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1982 Aug; 7(8):97-9. PubMed ID: 10273314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New PRO director seeking advice to improve program.
    Baldwin MF
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Oct; 16(22):36-7. PubMed ID: 10301090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coding notes ... designation of respiratory failure as a principal diagnosis to peer review organizations (PROs).
    Finnegan R
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Dec; 59(12):21-2. PubMed ID: 10312766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.