These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10109120)

  • 1. Evaluations of health promotion: combining realism with rigour.
    Owen N; Magnus P
    Aust Health Rev; 1990; 13(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 10109120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Case study: the Canadian Heart Health Initiative.
    Stachenko S
    WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):463-73. PubMed ID: 11729784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cancer prevention and control: from research through applications.
    Greenwald P; Cullen JW; McKenna JW
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1987 Aug; 79(2):389-400. PubMed ID: 3474469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Occupational health-promotion programs: evaluation efforts and measured cost savings.
    Katzman MS; Smith KJ
    Health Values; 1989; 13(2):3-10. PubMed ID: 10312913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Workplace health promotion program quality evaluation questionnaire].
    Korzeniowska E; Puchalski K
    Med Pr; 2002; 53(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 12577802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dialogue boxes: a tool for collaborative process evaluation.
    Roe K; Roe K
    Health Promot Pract; 2004 Apr; 5(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 15090168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Building evaluation capacity: definitional and practical implications from an Australian case study.
    Naccarella L; Pirkis J; Kohn F; Morley B; Burgess P; Blashki G
    Eval Program Plann; 2007 Aug; 30(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 17689328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The SGO Health Research Promotion Program. XIV. Final evaluation].
    van Rees-Wortelboer MM; Klasen EC; van Es JC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Jan; 143(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10086099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Preffi 2.0: a Dutch instrument to analyse the effectiveness of health promotion interventions].
    Molleman GR; Ploeg MA; Hosman CM; Peters L
    Promot Educ; 2004; Spec no 1():22-7, 49. PubMed ID: 15551691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple intervention research programs in community health.
    Edwards N; Mill J; Kothari AR
    Can J Nurs Res; 2004 Mar; 36(1):40-54. PubMed ID: 15133918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ten steps to making evaluation matter.
    Sridharan S; Nakaima A
    Eval Program Plann; 2011 May; 34(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 20970856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of countrywide health promotion policies: the Canadian experience.
    Warren R; Rootman I; Wilson R
    WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):387-403. PubMed ID: 11729780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The potential contribution of realistic evaluation to small-scale community interventions.
    Lhussier M; Carr SM; Robson A
    Community Pract; 2008 Sep; 81(9):25-8. PubMed ID: 18834025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A commentary on "Achieving Health for All: a Framework for Health Promotion".
    Connolly CR
    J Can Diet Assoc; 1989; 50(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 10293667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From diversity comes understanding: health promotion capacity-building and dissemination research in Canada.
    O'Loughlin J; Elliott SJ; Cameron R; Eyles J; Harvey D; Robinson K; Hanusaik N
    Promot Educ; 2001; Suppl 1():4-8. PubMed ID: 11677823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safe motherhood program evaluation: theory and practice.
    Milne L; Scotland G; Tagiyeva-Milne N; Hussein J
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2004; 49(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 15236714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues.
    Glasgow RE; Klesges LM; Dzewaltowski DA; Estabrooks PA; Vogt TM
    Health Educ Res; 2006 Oct; 21(5):688-94. PubMed ID: 16945984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating Australian Indigenous community health promotion initiatives: a selective review.
    Mikhailovich K; Morrison P; Arabena K
    Rural Remote Health; 2007; 7(2):746. PubMed ID: 17550334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.