These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1010928)

  • 1. Comparison of crossbred and purebred selection for a heterotic trait in highly selected populations of Tribolium.
    McNew RW; Bell AE
    J Hered; 1976; 67(5):275-83. PubMed ID: 1010928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of selected and control lines of Duroc and Yorkshire pigs and their reciprocal crossbred progeny.
    Bereskin B
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Oct; 57(4):867-78. PubMed ID: 6643303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Gene differential expression of liver tissues in crossbred versus purebred chicken and their relationship with heterosis of meat trait].
    Wang D; Zhang Y; Sun DX; Yu Y; Xu GY; Li JY
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2004 Mar; 31(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 15195564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds.
    Esfandyari H; Berg P; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Mar; 50(1):8. PubMed ID: 29566647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal definition of contemporary groups for crossbred pigs in a joint purebred and crossbred genetic evaluation.
    Steyn Y; Lourenco DA; Chen CY; Valente BD; Holl J; Herring WO; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Jan; 99(1):. PubMed ID: 33313883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine.
    Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2263-6. PubMed ID: 12350003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic selection of purebred animals for crossbred performance in the presence of dominant gene action.
    Zeng J; Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Apr; 45(1):11. PubMed ID: 23621868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Purebred and Crossbred Genomic Evaluation and Mate Allocation Strategies To Exploit Dominance in Pig Crossbreeding Schemes.
    González-Diéguez D; Tusell L; Bouquet A; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Aug; 10(8):2829-2841. PubMed ID: 32554752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):16. PubMed ID: 25887297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relevance of purebred information for predicting genetic merit of survival at birth of crossbred piglets.
    Cecchinato A; de los Campos G; Gianola D; Gallo L; Carnier P
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):481-90. PubMed ID: 19897636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-additive gene effects in populations under different methods of selection.
    Carbonell EA; Bell AE; Frey JJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 1989 Oct; 78(4):567-80. PubMed ID: 24225687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlations between purebred and crossbred body weight traits in Limousin and Limousin-Angus populations.
    Lukaszewicz M; Davis R; Bertrand JK; Misztal I; Tsuruta S
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Apr; 93(4):1490-3. PubMed ID: 26020170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An experimental comparison of selection alternatives to plateaued response.
    Brown WP; Bell AE
    Genetics; 1980 Feb; 94(2):477-96. PubMed ID: 17249006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A crossbred reference population can improve the response to genomic selection for crossbred performance.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47():76. PubMed ID: 26419430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds.
    Ask B; Pedersen LV; Christensen OF; Nielsen HM; Turner SP; Nielsen B
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Feb; 53(1):15. PubMed ID: 33579188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimizing purebred selection for crossbred performance using QTL with different degrees of dominance.
    Dekkers JC; Chakraborty R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2004; 36(3):297-324. PubMed ID: 15107268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Average genetic and heterotic effects on growth in mice selected for large 6-week body weight or rapid postweaning gain.
    Bakker H; Nagai J; Eisen EJ
    J Anim Sci; 1976 Dec; 43(6):1145-55. PubMed ID: 1002621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nurse capacity, fertility, and litter size in crossbred sows and genetic correlation to purebred sow information.
    Nielsen B; Christensen OF; Velander I
    J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):1827-33. PubMed ID: 27285680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marker-assisted selection for commercial crossbred performance.
    Dekkers JC
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Sep; 85(9):2104-14. PubMed ID: 17504955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.