These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10109452)

  • 1. Flaws & fallacies of performance evaluations.
    Beasley MA
    Food Manage; 1991 Feb; 26(2):58. PubMed ID: 10109452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Another look at performance appraisals.
    Hosp Food Nutr Focus; 1992 Dec; 9(4):3-5. PubMed ID: 10122699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The problem of the loyal (but unproductive) employee.
    Hosp Food Nutr Focus; 1993 Apr; 9(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 10124932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is your staff competent?
    Jackson R
    Hosp Food Nutr Focus; 1996 Feb; 12(6):2. PubMed ID: 10156472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Better performance appraisals.
    Beasley MA
    Food Manage; 1993 Sep; 28(9):38. PubMed ID: 10128372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monitoring productivity of the clinical staff.
    Laramee SH
    Hosp Food Nutr Focus; 1995 Jun; 11(10):4-5. PubMed ID: 10143028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. JCAHO update. Human resources.
    Dahl M
    Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2001 Sep; 18(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 11526735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Management success: viewing mistakes as opportunities.
    Hosp Food Nutr Focus; 1995 Sep; 12(1):1, 3. PubMed ID: 10145101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meeting the challenges of restructuring. Tips on surviving staff reductions.
    Hosp Food Nutr Focus; 1995 Sep; 12(1):1, 6-7. PubMed ID: 10145102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance appraisals: let staff take charge.
    ED Manag; 1995 Feb; 7(2):21, suppl 8 p.. PubMed ID: 10153547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Positive performance appraisal.
    Huss JJ
    Hosp Food Nutr Focus; 1989 Sep; 6(1):1, 4-8. PubMed ID: 10324676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Criteria-based performance review.
    Schwegel RW
    Hosp Food Nutr Focus; 1987 Jan; 3(5):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 10282158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The performance appraisal process.
    Moss GL
    Optometry; 2000 Dec; 71(12):796-9. PubMed ID: 11145305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance reviews. Subjective assessment of the past gives way formance reviews because it allows to IT-facilitated guidance.
    Berger S
    Healthc Inform; 2005 Jul; 22(7):43. PubMed ID: 16104145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. That time of year: conducting employee evaluations without dread.
    Edge RM
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(4):32-5. PubMed ID: 12918275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Documenting the competencies of your staff.
    Glavan A
    Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 1997 Dec; 14(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 10175271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tips on meeting competence standards.
    OR Manager; 2002 Jun; 18(6):15. PubMed ID: 12080542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ongoing review: change of mindset is now needed.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2007 Aug; 32(8):108-9. PubMed ID: 17763625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Installing a performance planning and results system.
    Roseman E
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1993 Dec; 25(12):36-8, 40. PubMed ID: 10130882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Designing and implementing a performance management system.
    Malone MP; Rucci AJ
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1986 Nov; 8(2):13-21. PubMed ID: 10279273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.