164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10109602)
1. The growing crackdown on laboratory fraud and abuse.
Albertson D
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1991 Feb; 23(2):24-9. PubMed ID: 10109602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hanlester Laboratories decision: important test of antikickback statute.
Tully WB
Healthspan; 1991 Apr; 8(4):9-12. PubMed ID: 10110667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Joint ventures become even riskier.
Azevedo D
Med Econ; 1993 Jul; 70(14):36-8, 41, 44-5. PubMed ID: 10127361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. HHS adopts tough kickback definition.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1991 Sep; 21(38):2. PubMed ID: 10114126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. HHS publishes long-awaited fraud and abuse anti-kickback regulations.
Weissburg C; Conn LC
Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1989; 22(2):45-7. PubMed ID: 10303427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Update: fraud and abuse and Stark laws.
Steiner JE
J Health Hosp Law; 1993 Sep; 26(9):274-82, 288. PubMed ID: 10136108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Joint ventures: beyond the safe harbors.
Kadzielski MA
Health Prog; 1989 May; 70(4):70, 77. PubMed ID: 10292848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Regulating physician investment and referral behavior in the competitive health care marketplace of the '90s--an argument for decentralization.
King KA
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Apr; (146):7-25. PubMed ID: 10110007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Expanded enforcement of the fraud and abuse laws.
Peregrine MW; Nodzenski TJ
J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Jan; 23(1):10-4, 32. PubMed ID: 10106419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. "Hanlester Laboratories": HHS joint venture standards remain unclear.
Tully WB
Healthspan; 1991 Nov; 8(10):8-11. PubMed ID: 10114943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Departmental appeals board issues final decision in Hanlester Network case.
Lindeke JM
Health Care Law Newsl; 1992 Nov; 7(11):11-4. PubMed ID: 10183756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Inspector General v. Hanlester Network: a new fraud and abuse standard?
Gummerman D
Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(4):59-61. PubMed ID: 10183523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hanlester Laboratories decision gives dangerously broad interpretation of federal anti-kickback statute.
Tully WB; Wirth PH
Healthspan; 1992 Jun; 9(6):11-4. PubMed ID: 10183678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. HCFA, IRS, FBI intensify fraud and abuse investigations.
Albertson D
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1992 Mar; 24(3):17-8. PubMed ID: 10117427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Physician self-referrals: Stark pushing total ban on physician ownership and self-referral deals.
Margolis RE
Healthspan; 1993 May; 10(5):14-6. PubMed ID: 10127750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. SmithKline settles charges of kickbacks at 3 labs.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1989 Dec; 19(52):3. PubMed ID: 10304218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How doctors are bailing out of self-referral facilities.
Mangan D
Med Econ; 1993 Feb; 70(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 10124204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. New fraud & abuse tax issues.
Integr Healthc Rep; 1993 Feb; ():10-1. PubMed ID: 10128314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Narrow 'safe harbors' may create tough choices for hospitals.
Hudson T
Hospitals; 1991 Oct; 65(19):32-6. PubMed ID: 1894272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Curing the health care industry: government response to Medicare fraud and abuse.
Hearn FJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1989; 5():175-201. PubMed ID: 10303502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
