These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10109603)

  • 1. When MTs mind the Paps: QA for send-out tests.
    Cruzvergara M
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1991 Feb; 23(2):31-5. PubMed ID: 10109603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical cancer screening from the public health perspective.
    Steiner C
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):471-4. PubMed ID: 2750437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. European guidelines on cervical screening.
    Smith JH; Desai MS
    Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):211-2. PubMed ID: 17635160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A continuous quality improvement project to improve the quality of cervical Papanicolaou smears.
    Burkman RT; Ward R; Balchandani K; Kini S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 84(3):470-5. PubMed ID: 8058251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for collecting samples for conventional and liquid-based cytology.
    Arbyn M; Herbert A; Schenck U; Nieminen P; Jordan J; Mcgoogan E; Patnick J; Bergeron C; Baldauf JJ; Klinkhamer P; Bulten J; Martin-Hirsch P
    Cytopathology; 2007 Jun; 18(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 17573762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of the new Bethesda System 2001 on specimen adequacy of conventional cervicovaginal smears.
    Fidda N; Miron J; Rodgers WH; Rader A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 15048956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Launching quality improvement in histology.
    Shaw PA
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1993 Mar; 25(3):45-9. PubMed ID: 10124714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Covering the bases with a new QA program.
    Bjerkan DL; McKelvy BW
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1991 Sep; 23(9):43-7. PubMed ID: 10114107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Recommendations from the experimental sites for implementing organized cervical cancer screening in France].
    Baudier F; Schapman S; Giordanella JP
    Sante Publique; 2000 May; 12 Spec No():71-88. PubMed ID: 10989630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality assessment in the age of machine-aided cervical cytology screening.
    Renshaw AA
    Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):345-7. PubMed ID: 15540251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controls in quality assessment in gynecologic cytology: A rational approach to workload limits for the ThinPrep imaging system.
    Renshaw AA; Elsheikh TM
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Oct; 38(10):772-5. PubMed ID: 20091901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Pap smear.
    Colyar MR
    Adv Nurse Pract; 2002 Jul; 10(7):22. PubMed ID: 12420546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear.
    Marchand L; Mundt M; Klein G; Agarwal SC
    WMJ; 2005 Aug; 104(6):51-5. PubMed ID: 16218317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving specimen collection by making a training video.
    Morrison J
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1993 Nov; 25(11):40-3. PubMed ID: 10130116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Maryland--Greece--Finland?].
    Mäkinen J
    Duodecim; 1999; 115(22):2506-7. PubMed ID: 11973975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technology and process and cervical cancer prevention.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Feb; 129(2):187-9. PubMed ID: 18208797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [How to read a PAP report?].
    Nieminen P
    Duodecim; 1998; 114(11):1138-43. PubMed ID: 11544696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primary care practice and facility quality orientation: influence on breast and cervical cancer screening rates.
    Goldzweig CL; Parkerton PH; Washington DL; Lanto AB; Yano EM
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Apr; 10(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 15124503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [An operative model: verification of the quality of the screening Pap test ].
    Montanari GR; Arnaud S; Berardengo E; Campione D; Cozzani C; Parisio F; Viberti L; Ghiringhello B
    Pathologica; 2001 Oct; 93(5):609-10. PubMed ID: 11725370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ASCCP patient management guidelines: Pap test specimen adequacy and quality indicators.
    Davey DD; Austin RM; Birdsong G; Buck HW; Cox JT; Darragh TM; Elgert PA; Hanson V; Henry MR; Waldman J;
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Nov; 118(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 12428791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.