133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10109643)
1. Specialty providers getting paid sooner.
Taravella S
Mod Healthc; 1991 Mar; 21(11):36-7. PubMed ID: 10109643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The implications of reimbursement changes for specialty hospitals.
Zimmerman E
Healthc Financ Manage; 2006 Jul; 60(7):42-5. PubMed ID: 16869322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Specialty providers fear PPS.
Wallace C
Mod Healthc; 1988 Jan; 18(3):20-1, 25-8, 30. PubMed ID: 10317994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of institutional services and characteristics on use of postacute care settings.
Buczko W
J Health Hum Serv Adm; 2001; 24(1):103-32. PubMed ID: 12134560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Getting ready for '75% rule'. Providers adjust to limits on rehab reimbursement.
Mantone J
Mod Healthc; 2005 May; 35(18):14. PubMed ID: 15898262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ready? What to expect from rehabilitation PPS.
Hosp Case Manag; 2001 Mar; 9(3):36-8, 33. PubMed ID: 11236279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 'Slashing and burning'. CMS final rule cuts LTAC money, ups providers ire.
Zigmond J
Mod Healthc; 2007 May; 37(19):8-9. PubMed ID: 17577915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. HCFA modifies "hospital within a hospital" proposal.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1997 Sep; 5(19):1-4. PubMed ID: 10173883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. HCFA clamping down on long-term acute care "hospitals within hospitals".
Campbell S
Health Care Strateg Manage; 1997 Aug; 15(8):12-3. PubMed ID: 10169038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. 75% rule ready to jump. Congress' effort to freeze rate unlikely to come in time.
DoBias M
Mod Healthc; 2007 Jun; 37(25):8-9. PubMed ID: 17828847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Hospitals see severity of situation. Specialty, rural facilities leery of CMS' DRG proposal.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Apr; 37(17):8-9. PubMed ID: 17477191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. DRG system flunks test for rehabilitation providers.
Firshein J
Hospitals; 1986 Oct; 60(20):24. PubMed ID: 3530967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Inpatient rehabilitation facilities are now paid prospective rates.
Grimaldi PL
J Health Care Finance; 2002; 28(3):32-48. PubMed ID: 12079150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rehab backlash. As new regs take effect, lobbying mounts for update.
Fong T
Mod Healthc; 2004 Jul; 34(27):12-3. PubMed ID: 15279112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Developing payment refinements and reforms under Medicare for excluded hospitals.
Langenbrunner JC; Willis P; Jencks SF; Dobson A; Iezzoni L
Health Care Financ Rev; 1989; 10(3):91-107. PubMed ID: 10313100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rehabilitating your rehab. A three-pronged approach to success under PPS.
Rosee M
Contemp Longterm Care; 1999 Apr; 22(4):21-2. PubMed ID: 10351617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Limited service maximum fuss. Specialty hospital issue has caught the attention of senators as a physician-owned Oregon facility fights for its Medicare status.
Zigmond J
Mod Healthc; 2006 Mar; 36(11):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 16579104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The satellite lands inside. Some specialty inpatient providers save money on expansion by using space in other hospitals.
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 1999 Oct; 29(42):65-6, 68, 70. PubMed ID: 10623230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rethinking rehabilitation. PPS means big changes for providers and rehabilitation companies.
Ross J
Subacute Care; 1996; 3(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 10157768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Saving the hospital-within-the hospital.
Murer CG
Rehab Manag; 2005 Mar; 18(2):42, 44. PubMed ID: 15786670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
