BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10109752)

  • 1. Utilization review: the art of polite interference.
    Jones S; Bailey NC
    Bus Health; 1991 Feb; 9(2):30-2, 36, 41-3. PubMed ID: 10109752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cracking the big case.
    Beresford L
    Bus Health; 1991 May; 9(5):39-42, 44, 49-53. PubMed ID: 10110526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What companies are learning from claims data.
    Durso KA
    J Health Care Benefits; 1994; 4(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 10137538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. UR only as good as what you save.
    Grobman M
    Bus Health; 1991 Jul; 9(7):20-2, 24, 26-30. PubMed ID: 10112452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. UR accreditation raises questions among employers.
    Wise D
    Bus Health; 1993 Jan; 11(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 10125563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Business applications for UR programs.
    Girten J
    J Qual Assur; 1987; 9(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 10291858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utilization management and data acquisition: a case study.
    Blackwood MJ
    Benefits Q; 1994; 10(3):38-42. PubMed ID: 10136671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Employers balk at provider-backed efforts to limit reach of utilization-review firms.
    Kenkel PJ
    Mod Healthc; 1991 Oct; 21(41):30. PubMed ID: 10114204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Healthcare cost-control analysts need historical data on use of funds.
    Chenoweth D
    Occup Health Saf; 1991 Apr; 60(4):32-3. PubMed ID: 2052270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The next generation of utilization review.
    Trauner JB
    Bus Health; 1987 Feb; 4(4):14-6. PubMed ID: 10280662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gauging the performance of utilization review.
    Milstein A; Oehm M; Alpert G
    Bus Health; 1987 Feb; 4(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 10280661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is utilization review paying off?
    Vibbert S
    Bus Health; 1989 Feb; 7(2):20-6. PubMed ID: 10293557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seeking sane solutions: managing mental health and chemical dependency costs.
    Pflaum BB
    Empl Benefits J; 1991 Sep; 16(3):31-5, 40. PubMed ID: 10170846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychiatric case management offers cost, quality control.
    Rodriguez AR; Maher JJ
    Bus Health; 1986 Mar; 3(4):14-7. PubMed ID: 10275298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hospital utilization review pays off: experts.
    DiBlase D
    Bus Insur; 1986 Feb; 20(7):12, 14, 18. PubMed ID: 10275767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Usage review in flux, says panel.
    Zoler ML
    Med World News; 1989 Nov; 30(22):24. PubMed ID: 10296785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Employers might lose a popular cost-cutter.
    Med Econ; 1991 Apr; 68(8):17. PubMed ID: 10110086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. UR: from cost cutting to managing care.
    Bus Health; 1993 Sep; 11(10):41-4. PubMed ID: 10128300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. More companies let 'experts' second-guess doctors' claims.
    Med Econ; 1994 May; 71(10):11. PubMed ID: 10133945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Data watch. A sample of cost-cutting strategies.
    Bus Health; 1993 Sep; 11(10):16-7. PubMed ID: 10128296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.